Protection legal professionals allege prosecutorial misconduct in El Paso Walmart capturing case

Join The Transient, The Texas Tribune’s every day publication that retains readers in control on probably the most important Texas information.

---

The capital homicide and assault prices towards the accused El Paso Walmart mass shooter ought to be dismissed, or the demise penalty ought to be taken off the desk due to repeated prosecutorial misconduct, protection legal professionals stated in a movement filed Monday.

The movement alleges that prosecutors since 2020 have violated the rights of Patrick Crusius, now 26, who’s charged within the Aug. 3, 2019, mass capturing that killed 23 individuals and wounded 23 others.

The protection’s movement alleges that the state case towards Crusius is “permeated with the misconduct of the El Paso District Attorney’s Office.” Whereas lots of the allegations contain former District Legal professional Yvonne Rosales, among the alleged misconduct occurred through the administrations of former DA Jaime Esparza and present DA Invoice Hicks.

The allegations embody improper witness contact, ongoing violations of a court-imposed gag order, suppression of exculpatory proof, misleading evidence-sharing practices, and violating Crusius’ proper to confidential attorney-client communication.

Prosecutors haven’t but responded in court docket to the movement. A gag order issued in July 2020 by 409th District Choose Sam Medrano largely prohibits events within the case from discussing it exterior of the court docket course of.

The movement asks Medrano to permit the protection crew to conduct further discovery — a authorized time period for locating proof held by prosecutors — that may present info on alleged misconduct.

Due to the scope of the alleged misconduct, the decide ought to take into account dismissing the costs towards Crusius or forestall the state from in search of the demise penalty.

The protection movement acknowledges that, “In general, a trial court cannot preclude the State from seeking the death penalty based on a speculative violation of the defendant’s rights.”

“However, the Court of Criminal Appeals has held that in certain circumstances, where the State has committed an egregious infraction, the trial court has the power to ameliorate the harm caused with drastic remedies, up to and including dismissing the indictment,” the movement stated.

The following listening to within the Walmart mass capturing case is about for Thursday, when Medrano will focus on potential scheduling resulting in a trial. Crusius has been ordered to look on the listening to, which can mark the primary time he’s appeared in state court docket since his arraignment in October 2019.

Crusius pleaded responsible final yr to federal hate crimes and weapons prices, and was sentenced to 90 consecutive life phrases in jail. The federal system has no parole, so he would spend the remainder of his life in jail.

Minutes earlier than the capturing, Crusius posted a racist screed on the web saying he was performing to “stop the Hispanic invasion of Texas.”

Federal prosecutors opted to not search the demise penalty, and Crusius determined to plead guilty days later. The U.S. Justice Division has declined to touch upon why it didn’t search the demise penalty, however Assistant U.S. Legal professional Ian Hanna stated on the sentencing listening to that Crusius had been recognized with schizoaffective dysfunction.

Allegations throughout Yvonne Rosales’ administration

A lot of the protection movement highlights allegations beforehand made towards Rosales and her crew. She was elected district legal professional in 2020 to succeed Esparza, however resigned in December 2022 amid allegations of repeated failures, together with in her dealing with of the capturing case.

Protection attorneys Joe Spencer, Mark Stevens and Felix Valenzuela filed Monday’s movement.

The movement stated Rosales allowed her authorized advisor, Roger Rodriguez, to be in conferences discussing the Walmart capturing, regardless that he was not an worker of the DA’s workplace. That included a gathering with victims’ households on July 1, 2022, after a listening to the place Medrano criticized Rosales for making public statements in regards to the case however doing little to arrange for trial. Medrano issued a gag order simply earlier than that listening to that prohibited legal professionals and potential witnesses within the case from making public feedback.

It was at that assembly that Rodriguez met the household of Alexander Gerhard Hoffmann, a Ciudad Juárez resident who was amongst these killed on the Walmart, the movement said. On Aug. 4, 2022, Rodriguez used household to ship an e mail to the media criticizing Medrano and a former prosecutor within the case, the movement stated, citing a report filed by a lawyer appointed by Medrano to look into who had despatched the e-mail and whether or not it violated the gag order.

Hoffmann’s household grew suspicious of Rodriguez in conferences and started recording their interactions with him, stated the report by El Paso legal professional Justin Underwood.

The protection movement filed Monday stated Rosales and her crew impeded Medrano’s efforts to be taught the origins of the e-mail by making an attempt to dam Hoffmann’s household from coming to El Paso for a listening to.

Hoffmann’s widow, Rosa Maria Valdez Garcia, and his son, Thomas Hoffmann, ultimately testified at a Nov. 30, 2022, listening to and stated Rodriguez had used the widow’s cellphone to ship the e-mail to the media. Additionally they stated Rodriguez had made threats towards them when he believed they weren’t cooperating.

Crusius’ legal professionals tried to query Rosales in regards to the e mail through the listening to on Dec. 1, 2022, however she asserted her Fifth Modification rights towards self-incrimination and refused to reply the questions.

“The DA’s Office has not yet produced any documentation or information about its office’s contact with the Hoffmann family or any subsequent internal investigation, if one was conducted by this administration, or the role played by Rosales, Cox or anyone else at the DA’s Office in impermissible conduct; or similar involvement with other potential witnesses, including other victims’ family members,” the protection legal professionals stated of their movement Monday.

Hicks was appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott to exchange Rosales. He has served because the lead prosecutor within the Walmart capturing since taking workplace in December 2020.

Accusations towards Hicks

The protection movement contains a number of accusations of violations by the District Legal professional’s Workplace since Hicks’ appointment.

The legal professionals stated Hicks has recurrently violated Medrano’s gag order by making statements to the media in regards to the Walmart case.

The movement stated Hicks had information conferences in regards to the case in January and July 2023, and did an intensive interview in regards to the case with KVIA-TV in December 2023.

Medrano carried out a closed-door assembly with protection legal professionals and prosecutors in February 2024 “to address the ongoing concerns regarding compliance with the gag order,” and prosecutors and protection legal professionals reaffirmed their dedication to complying with the order, the movement stated.

Protection legal professionals stated “District Attorney Bill Hicks continued to flout the gag order” after the February assembly, although they didn’t cite particular examples.

Hicks’ statements create a prejudicial pre-trial surroundings for Crusius, his lawyer stated of their movement.

The movement additionally stated the District Legal professional’s Workplace violated Crusius’ Sixth Modification proper to counsel by requesting and receiving jail visitation logs that included the defendant’s interactions with protection legal professionals and with psychological specialists employed by the protection.

U.S. District Choose David Guaderrama issued an order in March 2020 that any jail logs of Crusius’ conferences together with his protection crew not be shared with regulation enforcement or prosecutors, together with state prosecutors.

The protection movement contains an affidavit by Kevin Lanahan, an assistant chief with the El Paso County Sheriff’s Workplace, stating that the DA’s Workplace requested “all visitation logs” in February 2023, and that the Sheriff’s Workplace offered the information to Hicks’ workplace on a weekly foundation beginning then.

On Could 1, 2023, the DA’s Workplace issued a subpoena for information associated to visits to Crusius by psychological professionals, “to include the doctor’s name, notes, findings, diagnosis, prescriptions and dates and times of the visits.” The information had been launched to the DA’s Workplace two days later, Lanahan’s affidavit stated.

Lanahan stated he realized in regards to the launch of the information on Could 4, 2023, in an e mail from Spencer. “I immediately ordered that the records covered by the Order no longer be released to the District Attorney’s Office,” his affidavit stated.

The affidavit stated the information obtained from the subpoena had been positioned right into a sealed envelope.

“Multiple steps have been taken to ensure that there is no further violation of the Order,” Lanahan stated within the affidavit, dated Could 8, 2023.

Recording of attorney-client cellphone calls

The earliest alleged violations cited within the protection movement are from 2020, when Esparza was district legal professional.

The protection legal professionals stated prosecutors recorded 15 cellphone calls between Crusius and his attorneys from Aug. 25, 2020, to Jan. 14, 2021 (the movement seems to incorrectly date the final name in 2020.)

“Combined, the fifteen calls amount to 3 hours, 34 minutes, and 52 seconds of communications between Mr. Crusius and the defense that are protected by the attorney-client privilege that the State has in its possession,” the protection movement states. “The State’s possession of these jail calls – which span a period of nearly five months – underscores the fact that the State’s possession of these privileged calls were neither an isolated nor accidental incident.”

The protection movement does not present any info on how they know state prosecutors have recordings of calls with their consumer.

Esparza is now the U.S. legal professional for the Western District of Texas. He hasn’t responded to a request for remark from El Paso Issues.

James Montoya, the Democratic nominee taking over Republican Hicks within the November district legal professional election, was a member of the Walmart prosecution crew when Esparza was in workplace. He hasn’t responded to a request for remark from El Paso Issues.

Prosecutor sues county over firing by Rosales

The protection movement comes two weeks after a veteran prosecutor sued El Paso County, alleging he was wrongfully terminated by Rosales.

The federal lawsuit, filed Aug. 22 by John Briggs, contains lots of the allegations involving Rosales and Rodriguez that had been cited by Crusius’ protection crew of their movement Monday. The county is the one defendant within the case.

Briggs was fired by Rosales in August 2022 after he raised considerations about Rodriguez’s involvement within the Walmart case, in response to his lawsuit.

His lawsuit alleges Rosales was “a colossal disaster as the El Paso County District Attorney. Her brief tenure was indelibly marred by incompetence and scandal so pervasive that it eventually culminated with her resignation, but only after she invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when asked to explain her actions.”

Briggs was initially employed by Esparza and has labored greater than 25 years within the District Legal professional’s Workplace. He was rehired by Hicks in February 2023 and serves as chief of the trial division.

This article first appeared on El Paso Issues and is republished right here underneath a Inventive Commons license.

---

The Texas Tribune’s signature occasion of the yr, The Texas Tribune Pageant, brings Texans nearer to politics, coverage and the day’s information from Texas and past. On Sept. 7, we wrapped our 2024 Pageant — three unforgettable days filled with 100+ periods and occasions.

Browse on-demand recordings and atone for the largest headlines from Pageant occasions on the Tribune’s Pageant information web page.