Subscribe to The Y’all — a weekly dispatch in regards to the individuals, locations and insurance policies defining Texas, produced by Texas Tribune journalists residing in communities throughout the state.
The U.S. Supreme Courtroom has agreed to take up a yearslong dispute over a plan to ship extremely radioactive nuclear waste to rural West Texas, a case that might have sweeping implications for a way the nation offers with a rising stockpile of waste generated by nuclear energy crops.
An organization known as Interim Storage Companions has lengthy pursued the plan to maneuver “high-level” nuclear waste from energy crops throughout the nation to an present nuclear waste storage facility in Andrews County, on the Texas-New Mexico border.
Final yr, in a Texas-led lawsuit, a federal courtroom blocked the plan and threw out Interim Storage Companions’s federal license to deal with the waste. A federal appeals courtroom upheld the choice earlier this yr, however the firm and the Nuclear Regulatory Fee urged the Supreme Courtroom to rethink the ruling.
The excessive courtroom agreed to take up the case on Friday, Oct. 4., allotting one hour for oral arguments at a later date. The courtroom additionally consolidated a associated problem from the waste firm into the Texas case.
For years, this dispute has been percolating in decrease courts, the Texas Legislature and amongst probably impacted rural communities. Texas lawmakers handed a legislation that successfully banned the nuclear waste plan in 2021, cheered on by Gov. Greg Abbott and an unlikely alliance of oil, ranching and environmental pursuits.
Nonetheless, the waste firm and the federal authorities – most just lately beneath the Biden administration – have fought to maintain the plan alive.
“We are confident we have a strong position for the Solicitor General to argue before the court,” NRC spokesperson David McIntyre stated.
The elemental query now earlier than the Supreme Courtroom is whether or not federal regulators have the authority to approve plans for privately operated, high-level nuclear waste storage websites which can be positioned far-off from the place the waste is generated. A ruling within the Texas case would nearly definitely have implications for an almost an identical proposal simply over the state line in New Mexico that’s additionally nonetheless being fought over in a decrease federal courtroom.
Crucial Texas information,
despatched weekday mornings.
Whereas a number of federal courts have now dominated federal legislation doesn’t permit for the licensing of such amenities, supporters of the Texas and New Mexico plans – together with the nuclear power trade – insist the courts are fallacious.
“The Atomic Energy Act provides a comprehensive framework for regulating nuclear generation and the related fuel cycle, granting the NRC broad authority over both at-reactor and away-from-reactor used fuel storage,” Ellen Ginsberg, an advocate and lawyer with the commerce group Nuclear Power Institute, stated in an announcement.
Ginsberg stated a Supreme Courtroom ruling in favor of Texas “would further delay progress in advancing a safe, environmentally sustainable, and well-managed used fuel management system.”
The West Texas firm Fasken Oil and Ranch is among the many entities which have fought the nuclear waste plan for years. Monica Perales, an lawyer for the agency, stated the plan’s opponents stay assured of their authorized arguments.
“Oil and gas interests are concerned because it’s a threat to our industry, to the people who work in the industry, it’s a threat to the Permian Basin, and we’re the most productive oil and gas region in the United States,” she informed Marfa Public Radio.
The query of what to do with nuclear waste from energy crops – among the many most harmful sorts of such waste – has vexed U.S. administrations from each political events for many years.
As NPR has reported, Congress tried to unravel the quandary within the Eighties, however political roadblocks to discovering a everlasting residence for poisonous waste quickly developed.
The proposed waste amenities in Texas and New Mexico are primarily aimed toward being stopgap measures to supply a “temporary” residence for the waste – although that might quantity to a long time – whereas the U.S. continues its seek for a everlasting disposal resolution.
