Texas farmers say sewage-based fertilizer tainted with “forever chemicals” poisoned their land and killed their livestock

Join The Temporary, The Texas Tribune’s day by day publication that retains readers on top of things on probably the most important Texas information.

---

JOHNSON COUNTY — Tony Coleman acknowledges the indicators all too effectively. A cow drools strings of saliva. Then it begins to limp, every step slower. Then it grows stiff.

Then it’s fast. There’s nothing to be accomplished. The cow dies.

Since early 2023, the Grandview rancher has watched greater than 35 of his 150 Black Angus cattle perish. July was particularly brutal. Within the span of every week, Coleman misplaced a 3-week-old calf; a cow; and Little Crimson, a robust bull stuffed with spirit, leaving Coleman with nothing however unanswered questions.

“This is destroying our lives,” Coleman stated. “You never know what you’re going to get every day when you get down here.”

Subsequent door, James Farmer has misplaced two calves, and located two of his spouse’s beloved horses toppled to the bottom like dominos, their our bodies swarmed by buzzards.

“It’s hard for me to tell her, because I know she’s gonna break down,” he stated. “Why are our animals dying? Just back to back? It never ends.”

Months earlier than, the lads stated they seen a gag-inducing sewage scent drifting from smoking piles of fertilizer on their neighbor’s property. Heavy rains then washed among the fertilizer onto their land. Quickly after, they stated they discovered fish floating lifeless within the inventory ponds their livestock drink from.

They contacted the county with their considerations, triggering a nine-month investigation. That’s when their cattle and horses started to die.

An environmental crime investigator in Johnson County collected samples of the lifeless animals’ tissue and organs, the water they drank from, the soil and the fertilizer that was utilized subsequent door.

After the county acquired take a look at outcomes, the 2 households lastly obtained their reply: The animals had been killed by one thing within the fertilizer.

The fertilizer had been made with biosolids, a part of an effort to discover a climate-friendly methodology to recycle municipal sewage. However the fertilizer additionally contained artificial and extremely hazardous chemical substances often known as PFAS, that are present in tons of of family merchandise and have had devastating results on farms and ranches that inadvertently unfold them on their land.

An untold variety of farms and ranches throughout Texas and the remainder of the nation could have additionally used fertilizer created from sewage tainted with these “forever chemicals” — which don’t break down within the surroundings — with out realizing it.

PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are man-made chemical substances used because the Forties which have a singular skill to repel oil and water and resist warmth. They’re utilized in merchandise like nonstick cookware, pizza bins, waterproof mascara, bathroom paper, soaps and rain jackets.

There are greater than 12,000 sorts of PFAS, however researchers have solely studied the well being results of roughly 150. They’ll contaminate meals and water and construct up within the physique over time. Publicity to sure PFAS has been linked to most cancers, low delivery charges and delivery defects, injury to the liver and immune system, and different critical well being issues. One research discovered the chemical substances within the blood of practically 97% of all People.

As a result of their widespread use in shopper merchandise, eternally chemical substances have been discharged into waterways by chemical producers, trucked to landfills with family trash or flushed into metropolis sewers by way of bogs, sinks, showers and washing machines.

Then they find yourself in native wastewater remedy vegetation the place the solids are separated from sewage. Fertilizer firms who are sometimes paid to haul these biosolids away course of them into fertilizer that’s bought to farmers and ranchers as a less expensive various to chemical fertilizers.

A variety of Texas wastewater vegetation have contracts with fertilizer firms to take their biosolids, together with Fort Value, Houston, San Antonio, Dallas and Arlington. Nationally, greater than half of sewage sludge was handled and unfold on land, based on one research; 19 billion kilos of it was unfold on American farms between 2016 and 2021, the nonprofit Environmental Working Group present in 2022.

Wastewater remedy and biosolids specialists name this an environmental win-win as a result of these solids don’t go to landfills or incinerators — processes that create greenhouse gasses, which contribute to local weather change.

However no person is aware of how a lot of that fertilizer is contaminated with PFAS, which will be absorbed by crops, consumed by livestock, after which enter the meals provide. There are not any necessities to check biosolids for PFAS, or to warn farmers and ranchers that they may very well be utilizing contaminated fertilizer made with biosolids on their land.

“Some people are saying, [PFAS contamination] are isolated incidents. No, they’re not. I guarantee that this is a problem in every single state that uses biosolids,” stated Kyla Bennett, a former U.S. Environmental Safety Company worker who’s now a science coverage director for the nonprofit group Public Staff for Environmental Accountability.

“The reason we’re not hearing about it all over the country, in all 50 states, is because nobody’s looking for this problem,” Bennett added.

In keeping with EPA information analyzed by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group in 2022, an estimated 5% of all crop fields within the U.S. — as much as 20 million acres — may have used fertilizer made with biosolids. In Texas, greater than 157,000 dry metric tons of biosolids-based fertilizer had been utilized to agricultural lands in 2018.

Whereas the EPA not too long ago set limits for a handful of the chemical substances in ingesting water, these guidelines don’t cowl biosolids.

“The evidence is out there” that PFAS are a well being hazard, Bennett stated. “We shouldn’t have to wait [for the EPA to act].”

With out federal rules, some states have taken motion, requiring wastewater remedy vegetation to check their biosolids for PFAS or setting their very own limits for PFAS in biosolids. Texas just isn’t amongst them. State environmental regulators stated in an announcement they’re not required to by regulation.

Coleman and different Johnson County farmers who know their land is contaminated are actually confronted with an existential dilemma: Do they promote their cattle and their crops, realizing they’re doubtless laced with PFAS, or face monetary damage?

Coleman and Farmer have each determined to not promote any cattle. Which means the lads now run zombie farms. They pay to feed animals and harvest hay that they gained’t promote — a single 900-pound steer may promote for $4,800, Coleman stated.

“Everything we plant here is just sucking this [PFAS] stuff up,” Coleman stated. “The cows drink the water and eat the grass. For them there is no escaping.”

Nervousness in Johnson County 

In February, Johnson County residents packed the courthouse and listened intently as Dana Ames, an environmental crime investigator for the county, and different native officers defined the findings from the nine-month investigation into the noxious smells and lifeless livestock.

Ames, who spent $35,000 of the county’s cash on the investigation and despatched samples to a lab in Pennsylvania, informed residents that the liver of the Coleman’s stillborn calf contained 610,000 components per trillion of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, or PFOS, one of many many varieties of eternally chemical substances.

The tissue from a calf belonging to Farmer that died every week after being born examined at 320 ppt of PFOS.

At the moment, there are not any federal meals security requirements for PFAS. In Maine, which in 2016 grew to become the primary state to detect PFAS contamination at a farm, state officers issued limits for beef containing PFOS at 3.4 components per billion and milk containing PFOS at 210 components per trillion — that means that beef or milk exceeding these ranges ought to be thought-about unsafe for consumption. Maine, which has found 78 contaminated farms and shut 5 of them down, has been the one state to set its personal PFAS limits for meals.

Samples of the pond water the place the ranching households’ livestock drink from ranged from 84 ppt to 1,333 ppt of PFAS.

The county additionally examined the fertilizer their neighbor unfold on his farm and located 27 varieties of PFAS chemical substances, together with 4 out of the 5 the EPA has set limits for in ingesting water.

“These people were led to believe this was safe and a cheap fertilizer,” County Commissioner Larry Woolley stated on the assembly. “And this isn’t just isolated to this one incident or multiple counties. This is going on all over.”

“The amount of beef and milk that’s gone into the food chain, who knows what their PFAS levels are? The level of victimization is widespread,” he added.

The Colemans, Farmer and 4 different native farmers have sued Synagro, the Maryland-based firm that produced the biosolids-based fertilizer utilized on their neighbor’s fields, and Renda Environmental, a Texas-based fertilizer firm that bought to the neighbor earlier than Synagro. The lawsuit claims the businesses knew concerning the contaminants within the fertilizer and failed to offer enough warnings to its prospects.

Synagro denies the allegations. Kip Cleverley, a spokesperson with the corporate, stated the corporate did its personal testing on the land the place the fertilizer was utilized and preliminary outcomes discovered PFAS ranges within the single digits components per trillion within the floor water. The corporate didn’t present its take a look at outcomes to the Tribune, saying its evaluation was nonetheless in progress.

“The data strongly suggests that the farm where biosolids were used could not be a source for the PFAS allegedly found on the plaintiffs’ farms,” Cleverley stated.

Renda Environmental informed the Tribune the corporate doesn’t touch upon pending litigation.

In a separate lawsuit filed towards the EPA in June by Public Staff for Environmental Accountability on behalf of the farmers, the group claimed the company did not implement restrictions on PFAS in biosolids regardless of realizing the well being dangers posed by the chemical substances. Johnson County later joined the go well with.

“My heart breaks [for the farmers],” stated Bennett, the group’s science coverage director. “It could be years until the EPA sets biosolids regulations. Somebody needs to hold their feet to the fire … farmers are losing their livelihoods.”

The biosolids used to create the fertilizer that allegedly contaminated the Colemans’ and Farmers’ farms got here from Fort Value’s Village Creek Water Reclamation Facility, which treats sewage from 1 million individuals, many industries and 23 communities in North Texas. It generates between 27,000 to 31,000 tons of biosolids per yr.

Mary Gugliuzza, spokesperson for Fort Value Water, stated the fertilizer pellets produced by Synagro meet EPA and Texas Fee on Environmental High quality necessities.

Gugliuzza added town had examined a few of its biosolids for PFAS though it’s not required. These outcomes confirmed PFAS within the biosolids, however Gugliuzza stated that’s the case at wastewater amenities throughout the nation.

Synagro has contracts with greater than 1,000 municipal wastewater vegetation, industrial, and agricultural prospects in North America — together with Fort Value — to show biosolids, which one worker described as resembling chocolate milk, into fertilizer that it markets as nutrient wealthy and environmentally pleasant.

In 2022 Synagro processed 6.5 million tons of biosolids nationwide.

“The [EPA] has not suggested that any changes in biosolids management is required because of the presence of trace amounts of PFAS,” Cleverly, the corporate spokesperson, stated.

In September, the EPA responded to the lawsuit saying it has full discretion over which pollution to control below federal regulation — so it may well’t be sued.

However the company is now finding out the presence of PFAS in wastewater and sewage sludge nationally and conducting a threat evaluation on the usage of biosolids and sewage sludge containing the 2 most generally used and studied eternally chemical substances — PFOA and PFOS — specializing in well being dangers by publicity to soil, water, crops, meat and dairy. It expects to publish the outcomes by the tip of this yr, which is able to decide whether or not new federal guidelines are vital.

Who ought to be accountable for eradicating eternally chemical substances? 

In Texas, most biosolids find yourself in a landfill. However the remainder is diverted for agricultural use in Texas.

At San Antonio’s wastewater remedy plant, water is faraway from sewage sludge by utilizing a machine that squeezes it between two tensioned belts or by spreading it in drying beds so the solar evaporates the moisture. As soon as it’s dried to a crumb-like texture, the biosolids are piled into black mountains then transported to different amenities the place two Texas compost firms flip it into fertilizer.

Pitched as a cheap manner to enhance soil fertility, biosolids have been utilized to land within the U.S. because the Seventies. Scientists say they include nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium that helps vegetation develop.

The EPA solely requires wastewater remedy vegetation to check biosolids for heavy metals and pathogens that may be dangerous to well being.

If the EPA points new restrictions on PFAS in biosolids, utilities worry they’re more likely to bear the duty for eradicating the chemical substances from wastewater.

“If we are required to treat a particular chemical that is not covered in the way you already treat, you have to design a whole new system,” stated Ed Guzman, the senior vp and chief authorized and ethics officer on the San Antonio Water System. “You have to put it in place and that all takes time. It takes money.”

The price of elimination is critical: A 2023 report by the Minnesota Air pollution Management Company discovered that it could value between $2.7 million and $18 million per pound to take away and destroy PFAS from municipal wastewater, relying on facility measurement, and between $1 million and $2.7 million per pound of PFAS faraway from biosolids.

Adam Krantz, the CEO of the Nationwide Affiliation of Clear Water Companies, a bunch representing municipal wastewater remedy businesses, stated the price of remediation may very well be handed all the way down to water utility prospects, however argues that “polluters should pay.”“It really is the corporate polluter that needs to foot the bill for this as the wrongdoer,” he stated.

Others, like Janine Burke-Wells, govt director for the North East Biosolids & Residuals Affiliation, which represents wastewater remedy amenities and biosolids producers, stated that the duty to curb PFAS ought to fall on everybody.

“Unless we really eliminate all the sources of PFAS there’s always going to be a background level because [PFAS] is in everything,” Burke-Wells stated.

One county doing what it may well

In Johnson County, Woolley drives his silver pickup down rural roads, stating hay bales and miles of milo grain, corn and wheat — crops the county commissioner says have been blessed by heavy rainfall earlier this yr.

Woolley, a former agriculture trainer who moved to Grandivew in 1982, says he’s spent sleepless nights worrying about PFAS’ impacts on ranching households on this county of 180,000 residents.

“I lay awake at night thinking of the magnitude of this whole deal. It’s just crazy,” Woolley stated. “This is just the tip of the iceberg. I think there’s gonna be so much public outcry on this … it’s gonna be hard for our state officials to ignore that.”

Following the county’s investigation, Woolley led the cost to go a neighborhood decision urging farmers to cease utilizing biosolids on their land.

The decision known as for Fort Value to cease sending its biosolids to fertilizer firms till the TCEQ exams them for the presence of PFAS and requested the EPA to set limits on PFAS in biosolids. The decision additionally known as on state lawmakers to control the applying of biosolids-based fertilizer on farmland or give energy to counties to take action.

“That’s the hard part,” Woolley stated. “We don’t have authority to ban biosolids.”

In July, neighboring Ellis County handed the same decision calling for regulation and laws to limit the applying of biosolids on farms and ranches till additional testing is completed. Since then, Kaufman, Henderson, Somervell and Sensible counties have accomplished the identical.

Woolley has traveled across the state to sound the alarm about PFAS at conferences for county officers. He stated he and his employees are getting ready to go to Austin to satisfy with state lawmakers through the subsequent legislative session. He hopes they’ll introduce new payments that can handle PFAS contamination in biosolids, together with giving counties cash to check for the contaminants, and require TCEQ to check biosolids statewide for eternally chemical substances.

Up to now, there have been no payments filed by state lawmakers concerning PFAS contamination in biosolids forward of the legislative session that begins in January.

In 2021, Michigan started requiring all municipal wastewater remedy vegetation to check their biosolids for PFAS earlier than spreading them on agricultural land. The state additionally started prohibiting the applying of biosolids containing greater than 150 components per billion of PFOS on agricultural land. Since then, the state has lowered that threshold to 100 ppb and added one other kind of PFAS to the record, PFOA.

What specialists consult with because the “Michigan model” has now been embraced by different states together with California, Wisconsin and Washington. Connecticut and Maine have banned the usage of biosolids on agricultural fields.

Ellen Mallory, a professor of sustainable agriculture at The College of Maine, stated state response has been essential given the shortage of requirements on the federal stage.

“The important part here is it’s really hard to have any response to PFAS contamination if we don’t have any standards. So a state like Texas that has no standards, what do you do? How do you help farmers determine if their food is safe or not?” she stated.

In the meantime, Tony Coleman and his spouse are nonetheless watching their livestock die. They pack lifeless cattle in a giant cooler, load them onto a trailer and drive 140 miles to a laboratory at Faculty Station the place vet technicians carry out a necropsy and take away tissue to be examined for PFAS.

The couple each work two jobs and are searching for a 3rd. They’re fearful they’ve misplaced the power to make a residing off their very own land.

“We can’t consciously sell you a side of beef and then you eat it and you get sick. What kind of people does that make us?” Coleman stated.

Disclosure: San Antonio Water System has been a monetary supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan information group that’s funded partly by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Monetary supporters play no position within the Tribune’s journalism. Discover a full record of them right here.