Studying Time: 3 minutes
Taylor Swift followers are going after C.J. Gardner-Johnson. However at what price?
On Sunday, February 9, the Eagles trounced the Chiefs throughout the Tremendous Bowl.
After Gardner-Johnson took a swipe at Travis Kelce — one which focused his girlfriend, Taylor Swift — Swifties are hitting again.
However these over-eager followers might have gone too far.
![Taylor Swift Followers Precise Revenge on C.J. Gardner-Johnson Taylor Swift Followers Precise Revenge on C.J. Gardner-Johnson](https://cdn.thehollywoodgossip.com/uploads/2025/02/0211_cjjohnson_01-1024x695.jpg)
What did C.J. Gardner-Johnson say about Taylor Swift?
Is there such a factor as a sore winner? Typically, evidently method.
Within the wake of the Philadelphia Eagles’ Tremendous Bowl victory on Sunday, C.J. Gardner-Johnson took to his Instagram Story to seemingly taunt Travis Kelce … whereas body-shaming Taylor Swift.
Posting a photograph of himself in entrance of Kelce, Gardner-Johnson wrote: “Should’ve Stayed w that thick s–t.” The belief is that he’s referring to the physique sort of Taylor Swift in distinction to the physique of Kelce’s ex, Kayla Nicole.
🚨🚨🚨WILD🚨🚨🚨#Eagles DB CJ Gardner-Johnson goes after Travis Kelce on his Instagram story this morning.
“Should’ve stayed with that thick sh*t.”
He’s speaking about Kelce breaking apart with Kayla Nicole for Taylor Swift. pic.twitter.com/qSaGEzlDKj
— MLFootball (@_MLFootball) February 10, 2025
Simply to get this out of the way in which — Kayla Nicole appears to be a Taylor Swift fan. It appears unlikely that she appreciates C.J. Gardner-Johnson utilizing her to taunt her ex.
Extra importantly, Gardner-Johnson appears to be body-shaming Swift, implying that she is much less fascinating as a result of her physique form.
Whereas we don’t think about that this may hit residence with the pop star billionaire, it does ship a really dangerous message to numerous younger girls who would possibly (understandably) thirst after Gardner-Johnson and consider themselves to be insufficient. Physique-shaming is actually by no means okay.
![CJ Gardner-Johnson on February 5, 2025.](https://cdn.thehollywoodgossip.com/uploads/2025/02/0211_cjjohnson_02-1024x683.jpg)
Followers of Taylor Swift are exacting revenge upon C.J. Gardner-Johnson
Sadly, revenge is seldom as good because it seems in tales. Harm is usually misplaced. And, many would argue, the vitality that goes into revenge can be extra helpful enhancing one’s personal life.
However Taylor Swift followers took goal at C.J. Gardner Johnson within the aftermath of his put up. They’re doing so by leaving unfavourable opinions in the direction of a restaurant, King’s Grill.
King’s Grill is an eatery in Rockledge, Florida. The proprietor is Delatron Johnson, the mom of C.J. Gardner-Johnson. Which implies that this enterprise, and Gardner-Johnson’s mom, is collateral harm.
![Taylor Swift on February 9, 2025, while attending the Super Bowl.](https://cdn.thehollywoodgossip.com/uploads/2025/02/0211_taylorswift_01-1024x682.jpg)
Many restaurant homeowners have accused Yelp of being a lower than useful service. Nevertheless, the sudden inflow of one-star opinions was sufficient to set off an “Unusual Activity Alert” for the restaurant’s web page.
In consequence, nobody can go away recent feedback or unfavourable opinions. Presumably, this may change when the joy dies down.
In the meantime, Google opinions have additionally undergone adjustments. It seems that the current inflow of opinions have merely been eliminated.
![CJ Gardner-Johnson of the Philadelphia Eagles sportsball team on December 22, 2024.](https://cdn.thehollywoodgossip.com/uploads/2025/02/0211_cjjohnson_03-1024x683.jpg)
This isn’t the way in which
Like Taylor Swift, C.J. Gardner-Johnson is answerable for his personal selections. His mom and her restaurant are usually not.
Whereas it’s seemingly that an Eagles participant has sufficient dough to maintain a household restaurant afloat it doesn’t matter what, that’s not likely the purpose.
Maybe these Taylor Swift followers — and Chiefs followers, who’ve additionally been getting in on the motion — ought to think about what an applicable, proportional response to Gardner-Johnson’s juvenile taunt is likely to be. This isn’t it.