Mergers and acquisitions prone to dominate in 2025

This report is on the market solely to subscribers of Inman Intel, the information and analysis arm of Inman providing deep insights and market intelligence on the enterprise of residential actual property and proptech. Subscribe immediately.

Fee lawsuits and battles involving the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors have dominated latest headlines. However quietly within the background, one thing else was additionally happening: Main acquisitions and mergers.

Excessive-profile examples embody Compass shopping for Latter & Blum in April and @properties Christie’s Worldwide Actual Property in December, in addition to Howard Hanna merging with House Specialists Realty final month. These and related tales increase a number of questions: Will equally large acquisitions proceed this 12 months? What kinds of firms will do the buying, and what sorts will likely be wolfed up?

In different phrases, was 2024 a prelude or a postscript to the consolidation story?

TAKE THE INMAN INTEL INDEX SURVEY FOR FEBRUARY

To seek out out, Intel contacted business consultants — for each on- and off-the-record talks — and surveyed brokerage leaders in our newest Inman Intel Index survey.

The takeaway from these efforts is that a wide range of components are converging to doubtlessly make 2025 a banner 12 months for mergers and acquisitions. Put one other manner, there’s an excellent probability that 2024 was in reality only a prelude.

However on the identical time, not everyone seems to be prone to be a victor on this story. As an alternative, large and highly effective firms which have a observe document of succeeding in lean instances could be the ones making probably the most headlines for M&A offers this 12 months.

Most brokerage leaders aren’t targeted on M&A

In January, Intel requested brokerage leaders to rank mergers and acquisitions on a scale of 1 to 5. One indicated that M&A was not on their radar, whereas 5 indicated that imminent discussions have been happening. The outcomes prompt that mergers and acquisitions should not particularly excessive on the precedence record for lots of the almost 200 brokerage leader-respondents.

• Practically 47 p.c of survey respondents chosen one, that means M&A just isn’t on their radar. One other 12 p.c chosen two, equally indicating that M&A is a low precedence.
• Solely 8 p.c of respondents chosen 5, with one other 12 p.c deciding on 4 — responses indicating that M&A is a significant precedence.
• Outcomes have been related when Intel requested leaders about M&A in 12 months. In that case, 36 p.c of respondents chosen one — which once more on this query meant the subject is “not on the radar” — and one other 16 p.c chosen two. Solely 11 p.c of respondents chosen 5.

Acquisitions move to the massive firms

None of this implies, nonetheless, that mergers and acquisitions received’t be a giant deal this 12 months. In truth, everybody who spoke with Intel for this story predicted important M&A information within the coming months.

“I think it’ll be a very active year,” Chris Heller, president of OJO/movoto.com, instructed Intel in a remark that captured a broader sentiment. “I think a lot of companies are looking to grow and I think we’ll see a lot of activity.”

The takeaway, then, is that M&A will not be evenly distributed; en masse, acquisitions will not be on each radar, however its a subject that’s very a lot on the radar of some large gamers.

The consultants supplied a number of causes that 2025 is perhaps energetic for M&A.

• A gradual market has put stress on smaller firms for a number of years now.
  • “You’re going to see companies basically saying I don’t see a way out of this and I want to cash my chips in,” Russ Cofano, CEO of Collabra Know-how, instructed Intel.
  • “As the industry goes through challenging times, you tend to see a lot of consolidation,” Heller stated.
• Bigger firms resembling Compass have managed to develop regardless of a gradual market.
  • Compass, for instance, reported progress in each income and agent rely within the first three quarters of 2024.
  • EXp’s agent rely progress largely remained stalled in 2024, however the firm did report income positive factors within the first three quarters of final 12 months.
  • “The big companies probably feel like they’ve weathered the storm,” Heller stated. “They’re not looking at 2025 as, ‘let’s just get to the other side.’ They’re looking at 2025 as, ‘now we have to grow.’”
  • “With the big players, this is part of their strategy, they are actively looking at how to grow their companies with acquisitions,” Cofano stated. “Versus the smaller firms that is perhaps extra opportunistic in the best way they method an acquisition, by relationships at native ranges.
• Cloud-based firms resembling eXp, LPT, and Actual are rising and have leaner operations than conventional brokerages. Some M&A might consequently happen as conventional operations search for entry to these enterprise fashions.
  • The Actual Brokerage, for instance, reported final fall that its agent rely exploded by greater than 2,000 between July and October.
  • “It’s nearly impossible for a traditional brick-and-mortar company to suddenly become cloud based,” Cofano stated. “They almost need to kill their old model.”
• Personal fairness firms have been sitting on the sidelines for the final a number of years.
  • “A lot of the acquisitions are going to be from private equity,” Ben Kinney, co-founder of Place, which made 5 acquisitions final 12 months. “They’re sitting on enormous buckets of cash that they haven’t been able to deploy. They’re looking for opportunities and my phone is ringing off the hook.”
  • Kinney additionally stated that capital markets might give more cash this 12 months to “strong companies,” placing them in a “position to gobble up the weaker ones.”

Brokers are most considering making acquisitions

Intel additionally requested brokerage leaders who do have M&A on their radars what kinds of offers they may think about. Most indicated they’re extra considering gobbling up rivals than they’re in being wolfed up themselves.

• A plurality of respondents, or 48 p.c, stated their brokerage buying a competitor of their market was one thing their management groups would think about this 12 months.
• The second hottest response, at 38 p.c, pointed to their agency making an acquisition to increase into a brand new market.
• Solely a complete of 23 p.c indicated their management group could be open to promoting, both with that group staying in place or with them leaving.

The sturdy survive

Ongoing market stress means one kind of acquisition that will turn into widespread this 12 months will contain firms that haven’t but found out the brand new regular.

• “On the outside they may not look like they’re struggling, but they likely are,” Heller stated of some acquisition targets. “Things aren’t improving at the rate they need them too.”
• “For any real estate brokerage or brand, the key measure of success is how many great real estate agents you attract and retain,” Marc King, former president of Keller Williams, instructed Intel. You develop otherwise you go backward, there isn’t a stasis. Thus, any firm not prepared to evolve, develop and enhance its worth to the native agent will probably be a goal of acquisition.”

Nonetheless, the splashiest offers may very well contain firms which are thriving.

• “In those scenarios the companies being acquired have to see a 1+1=3 scenario,” Cofano stated. “They’re not companies that are necessarily financially struggling or feel like they don’t have a path forward. But they feel like with the acquisition, they and their agents can do financially better with new ownership and resources and scale and all those things that a larger organization can provide.”
• Kinney additionally pointed to money move optimistic firms — suppose regional brokerages or title corporations — as potential acquisition targets. “These companies are sold to private equity firms, public companies, or other profitable private firms trading on a multiple of EBITDA.”

Trickle down economics

Although Intel survey questions targeted on brokerage leaders, proptech got here up repeatedly in Intel’s conversations for this story. And the concept is that for all the difficulty the market has given brokerages, it has been a minimum of as dangerous for a lot of proptech corporations who earn money from actual property professionals — professionals who in nowadays might have a lot much less money. The result’s that 2025 could also be a interval of winnowing for the proptech world as firms merge in an effort to outlive, or to chop losses on the eleventh hour.

In different phrases, proptech might turn into floor zero for actual property M&A in 2025.

• “There’s a large number of startups that launched in the last five years that are in the stage where if they’re not profitable they’re going to be targets,” Heller opined. “If they aren’t successful in finding a home then they often times merge with other companies.”
• Kinney famous that in tech there could also be firms which have “bad product fit and low revenue,” by which case “these companies are often fire sales, purchased for scraps by smaller companies looking to create new revenue streams or boost their own numbers.”
• Different firms might have good merchandise, however battle with income progress. “These companies are acquired through a combination of cash and stock, offering founders an opportunity to have a bigger win with the acquiring company,” Kinney additionally stated. “They are typically bought by companies seeking to expand their customer base or product lines.”

Methodology notes: This month’s Inman Intel Index survey was performed Jan. 21-Feb. 4, 2025, and acquired 652 responses. The whole Inman reader neighborhood was invited to take part, and a rotating, randomized collection of neighborhood members was prompted to take part by electronic mail. Customers responded to a collection of questions associated to their self-identified nook of the true property business — together with actual property brokers, brokerage leaders, lenders and proptech entrepreneurs. Outcomes mirror the opinions of the engaged Inman neighborhood, which can not at all times match these of the broader actual property business. This survey is performed month-to-month.

E mail Jim Dalrymple II