The worldwide financial system is getting into a interval of radical change. For multinationals with cross-border provide chains, this can be a drawback. Nonetheless, Michelin’s CEO Florent Menegaux argues that the pliability his firm has developed over the last decade will assist it prevail by turbulent instances.
“The world was different before COVID and before President Trump was elected in 2016,” says Menegaux. “This triggered changes around the world. We are present in 175 countries globally, but the world is evolving, especially in relationships between countries. The geopolitical risk that has always existed is now top of our agenda. We’ve also seen war arriving suddenly in Europe, which has completely changed our supply chains. We heavily depended on Russia for raw materials, and overnight we had to change all our supply chains for these and for some components of our composites.”
132
Michelin’s rank on the Fortune 500 Europe
COVID modified the way in which firms handle their workers, too. “We thought that movement was natural, and suddenly more than half of the world was locked down,” continues Menegaux. “Then we had huge inflation that quickly changed the way we were envisaging supply chains as well because of sharp rising costs. All that has created a new world inside Michelin. We are thinking that maybe we were wrong in defining chaos and order. Previously, we had a view of order, but now maybe chaos is the new order.”
A brand new technique for the brand new chaos
“The question was whether our strategy was adequate in this new world,” says Menegaux. “Michelin has developed better agility.”
A method that Michelin has been enhancing its resilience to a chaotic setting is by diversifying enterprise into composites, the place completely different supplies are bonded collectively to type a single substance. Tires have been composites for many years, so this enterprise pivot leverages the corporate’s current experience. Michelin now makes versatile tubing, timing belts, enormous conveyor belts to be used in mining amenities, and rubberized material for inflatable boats.
175
The variety of nations the place Michelin operates
The corporate even manufactures tiny composite elements designed to be surgically launched into human our bodies to restore injury. Composites presently solely make up 5% of Michelin’s enterprise, however the intention is for the proportion to achieve 20% by 2030. The flagship composite undertaking is Michelin’s bid to offer airless tires for NASA’s Artemis mission Lunar Terrain Car. “Developing this technology will also have a lot of benefits for our day-to-day tires that will be used on Earth,” says Menegaux.
International competitors has been constructing for years and there’s no signal of it abating within the tire enterprise even with new tariff regimes. China is the obvious competitor now, however the menace is nothing new. “For the past 15 years, we have been competing heavily with China, and this is strengthening us, provided they obey the acceptable rules of the game,” says Menegaux. “We have made a lot of real advancements in our technologies because of the pressure from China. When I joined Michelin, the pressure was coming from Japan. After that, we had Korea. Because of the size of China, it’s very likely that one or two global, worldwide players will emerge, and after that, you will have one from India, and probably then you may see something coming from Africa. That’s okay, because we think the world vehicle number is going to double, so there is space for everybody. We have seen more than 100 tire manufacturers from China emerge in 20 years. So that will have to change. There is too much capacity, not enough technology.”
“The question was whether our strategy was adequate in this new world. Michelin has developed better agility.”
Michelin’s CEO, Florent Menegaux
Michelin has been reconfiguring its manufacturing footprint for years to take care of these shifting market situations. “We had a lot of plants for historic reasons,” says Menegaux. “We used to sustain our scattered footprint in Europe, because we were able to export out of Europe. Now the competitive environment is not adequate for us to export out of Europe, so we must envisage our footprint in Europe being for Europe.”
“We have revised how the global supply chain should be done,” says Menegaux. “For a while now, we have had a local-to-local vision. Sourcing something critical to your production from the opposite part of the world may not be a wise thing unless you’re forced to do that. For example, natural rubber trees don’t grow in Italy. They grow only in a band of 200 kilometers north or south of the equator. But do you need to manufacture things in China because it’s cheaper?”
Tariffs gained’t finish globalization, simply change its nature
The present tariff wars are supposed to fight the imbalances between manufacturing prices in numerous nations, however Menegaux reckons this gained’t forestall the inertia of globalization, which has been a web profit to the world. “We are already globalized now,” he says.
“However, the way this globalization is done may evolve. How do you make sure that wealth is evenly split amongst countries, but also amongst populations? If you are smarter, you can reduce costs. But if your cost structure is different because of tax or social conditions, it’s wrong. The preceding globalization has been done on the premise of finding something cheaper elsewhere, or with fewer rules on environmental conditions. But overall, globalization has been very good for the world, because hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty.”
Michelin’s methods of localization and diversification may make it much less susceptible to the U.S. tariff wars than some international firms. “Around 70% of what we sell in the U.S. is produced in the U.S.,” says Menegaux. “The tariffs will have an impact, but less than one might think. North America has been built on the NAFTA agreement, which promised free flow between Canada, Mexico and the U.S.” This turned the USMCA underneath Trump’s earlier presidency. “Suddenly changing those rules will be ineffective for those three countries. The economy will suffer because of the tariffs, and citizens will suffer because it will mean inflation. It’s impossible for us to change supply chains overnight. If tariffs stay for a few years, we will have to revisit our investment plans, and it will take a decade before it is effective.” Within the quick time period, Michelin should improve its costs. “What will happen is our customers will have to pay more, or they will switch to cheaper offers from other brands. But we are better placed than most of our competitors.”
However, globalization is altering even when it isn’t over. “It’s not chaos anymore, it’s the new order,” says Menegaux. “We don’t qualify this as chaos. We’ll adapt to that now. Europe should play a central role in the world, like China, like India tomorrow, like America. What we lack in Europe right now is a vision. The vision when we built the EU was to make peace in Europe. We needed to stop fighting each other, because we share a land. We have succeeded, because for 70 years, we didn’t have war created by the founders of the EU. But then we lost sight of why we are continuing to build Europe. We need a new vision. We think it’s just a giant supermarket. It’s not sufficient.”
Europe ought to play a central function on this planet, like China, like India tomorrow, like America. What we lack in Europe proper now’s a imaginative and prescient…
Florent Menegaux
The composites enterprise is maybe Michelin’s most radical shift in the direction of larger agility and a longer-term plan. “With composites, we are defining a new business category that didn’t exist before,” says Menegaux. Nevertheless it’s only one a part of a shift in the direction of larger flexibility. “It’s like good cooking,” concludes Menegaux—he’s French, in any case. “Sometimes you need more salt, sometimes you need a bit more sugar. It’s never the same. You adapt based on certain conditions. It’s more a question of adapting to the instant priority of the moment, rather than changing the long-term strategy. We are clear on where we want to go. We don’t know exactly the journey to get there.”
This story was initially featured on Fortune.com
