Speaker Dustin Burrows, as soon as tagged as “liberal,” stored skeptics at bay by leaning right into a conservative agenda

Join The Temporary, The Texas Tribune’s every day e-newsletter that retains readers on top of things on essentially the most important Texas information.

---

Again in December, Rep. Dustin Burrows’ grasp on the speakership was, at greatest, tenuous.

His foremost rival, Rep. David Prepare dinner of Mansfield, had already gained the endorsement of the Home Republican Caucus, a victory his backers argued ought to’ve clinched his ascent to speaker of the GOP-controlled Texas Home.

As an alternative, Burrows, surrounded by Republicans prepared to defy caucus guidelines, claimed simply minutes later that the race was over and that he had the 76 votes wanted to lock up the gavel. He touted an excellent mixture of Democratic and GOP help, although some Republicans instantly requested for his or her names to be eliminated, pushing him again underneath the brink to win.

The competing pronouncements deepened a bitter, months-long energy wrestle inside a Republican Occasion that had churned by three audio system in 4 classes, and it amplified calls for by grassroots activists to sideline Democrats and lean into the get together’s most partisan impulses.

Prepare dinner carried the banner of the hardline, so-called “reformers,” whose allies exterior the chamber maligned Burrows as a “liberal” intent on empowering Democrats. Burrows, in actual fact a staunch conservative and a key participant within the internal circle of Home management, represented a continuation of the institution that the get together’s rightmost faction had spent years preventing to depose.

Burrows gained the race, lastly, on the primary day of the legislative session, with a coalition made up of 49 Democrats and 36 Republicans. His reliance on the minority get together prompted instant assaults from his proper flank and fueled prices that he would cater to the Democratic bloc that drove his victory. A few of the newly seated “reformers” brazenly threatened retribution in subsequent yr’s primaries for colleagues who had backed him.

The speaker’s race was over, however now Burrows must govern a Home wracked by months of acrimony, elevating questions on how a lot might get executed with one chamber of the Legislature at struggle with itself.

As an alternative, the Lubbock Republican emerged 140 days later from his first session wielding the gavel with a laundry checklist of latest conservative legal guidelines to level to, having nearly fully prevented the turmoil his election portended.

“With 150 members, you’re always going to have 150 perspectives — that’s part of what makes our chamber unique,” Burrows stated in an announcement. “But the speaker’s job isn’t to force uniformity or go to battle with the Senate on every topic, it’s to protect the institution by making sure members have the tools and support they need to succeed on behalf of their districts and go home to show real accomplishments to the people they represent. I think we accomplished that.”

Burrows started the session with a transparent eye towards retaining the speakership and detaching himself from the tenure of his now-politically radioactive predecessor, Beaumont Rep. Dade Phelan. He aligned the Home carefully with Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the highly effective presiding officer of the Senate and frequent antagonist of previous audio system, and constructed goodwill with Gov. Greg Abbott by prioritizing college vouchers, the governor’s high precedence. And he labored methodically to win over skeptical members of his caucus, giving some committee chairmanships and ensuring others noticed their pet points attain the ground.

A cautious tactician with years of expertise in Home management, Burrows managed to ship nearly all main Republican priorities, together with vouchers, more durable bail legal guidelines and a raft of socially conservative insurance policies. But he did so with out absolutely alienating the Democrats who powered him to the speaker’s chair, at the same time as they noticed their get together’s priorities die and didn’t cease a lot of the GOP’s high objects.

“We really didn’t know what to expect because of how he was elected,” stated Rep. Mitch Little, a Lewisville Republican and Prepare dinner devotee who as soon as slammed Burrows’ supporters for making a “brazen attempt to circumvent the will of the voters.”

“But to be quite honest,” Little stated on the finish of the session, “if he had been elected by all Republicans, I don’t know how this session would have really gone any differently.” Complaining in regards to the few unfinished objects, he added, can be “picking nits more than anything.”

Not everybody got here away from the session completely happy. Some far-right lawmakers and activists continued to bemoan that the Legislature didn’t present sufficient property tax reduction and that different laws was left on the desk, together with a sweeping invoice to limit the stream of abortion treatment into the state and laws to require proof of citizenship to register to vote.

“I cannot go back in good conscience to my constituents and tell them that out of $24 billion in surplus money that belongs to them, I supported a budget that only is going to return $6.5 billion,” Rep. Mike Olcott, R-Fort Price, stated on the ground in opposing the Home’s funds proposal for not devoting sufficient to tax cuts.

Some Democrats walked away feeling like they obtained little for his or her vote to safe Burrows’ speakership, having anticipated extra conservative laws to get bottled up by the speaker’s appointed committee chairs. Democrats have been notably incensed a few invoice banning Okay-12 pupil golf equipment targeted on sexuality and gender identification, which they argued would endanger kids and strip them of their dignity.

Rep. Rafael Anchía, a Dallas Democrat whose daughter was vp of a college pleasure membership, informed the Tribune within the closing days of session that he ​​“didn’t sign up for five anti-LGBT bills this session.” It was an allusion to different measures Burrows greenlit by the Home, together with one which strictly defines man and lady in state information primarily based on reproductive organs — a change that might have far-reaching implications for transgender Texans.

Nonetheless, barring an surprising challenger or upheaval within the 2026 elections, Burrows is primed to take care of management of the chamber with higher Republican help, whereas avoiding the extent of scorched-earth infighting that outlined the top of Phelan’s speakership. And regardless of the session’s conservative bent, Democrats haven’t proven any makings of a revolt that would imperil Burrows’ place.

“He knows that we have a voice, and he knows we represent a whole lot of Texans, so he did give us some opportunities to be heard, at least,” Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., D-Fort Price, stated. “He’s a good listener. Because of that, I welcomed the opportunity to minimize as much damage as I could.”

Extending an olive department

Burrows’ elevation by Democrats to speaker was met with instant skepticism from many Republicans, and, importantly, from Patrick, who tightly controls the Senate.

“If he can pull it off — if he is the Houdini of the House, and he can pass all the conservative bills that we want — then I’ll pat him on the back and say job well done,” Patrick stated in an interview with The Texan Information, whereas additionally emphasizing that he was prepared to provide Burrows an opportunity. “But man, he’s put himself in a tough spot.”

In his acceptance speech after successful the gavel, Burrows promised to guard the Home as an unbiased establishment, the place lawmakers might disagree with one another with out concern of repercussions and get a good shake, even when they’d opposed him.

“This is the people’s House,” he stated. “I commit to you today: Every member will have a voice.”

To many members, he adopted by.

His aim from the beginning, a number of lawmakers of each events stated, was to make sure all members felt like they have been in a position to contribute to the work of the Home, and to determine a stable footing with the Senate and governor’s workplace.

“Whether someone supported me for speaker or not,” Burrows stated, “my message was the same to every member: If you’re serious about governing and ready to do the work, you’ll have a voice at the table.”

Hardline Republicans gained their foremost demand of barring Democrats from chairing committees, ending a Home custom in place because the Nineteen Seventies that preserved a smidgen of energy for the minority get together. Nonetheless, Burrows labored to make sure that Democrats would proceed to have a task to play, granting them a vice chair place on every panel that some later stated helped foster a way of cooperation. And he held common, substantive conferences all through the session with each chairs and vice chairs, in accordance with lawmakers in each events.

Burrows’ committee assignments additionally signaled a want to maneuver past the infighting, lawmakers stated. He appointed 4 Republicans who opposed his speakership to guide numerous panels, and he named Rep. Gary VanDeaver, R-New Boston, to chair the Public Well being Committee — a transfer that VanDeaver stated he took as a vote of confidence, regardless of his opposition to highschool vouchers, a serious GOP precedence of the session.

“He forgave the people who had come after him,” the agricultural Republican stated. “It was clear that he wanted to let bygones be bygones and bring the House together and work for the future. And I think it paid off.”

Burrows additionally labored to develop his relationship with Patrick and advance Abbott’s priorities, all seven of which made it throughout the end line. It was a stark departure from Phelan’s final time period, when his bitter feud with Patrick boiled over into a number of particular classes on property taxes, border safety and vouchers — points that have been every wrapped up by the point lawmakers adjourned this week.

The speaker’s curiosity in wiping the slate clear was evident when, in early March, he handed over two containers of “detailed expenditures” outlining how a lot the Home spent on Lawyer Normal Ken Paxton’s impeachment in 2023. That fulfilled Patrick’s longstanding insistence on auditing every chamber’s impeachment spending and symbolically closed the chapter on a problem that divided the chambers above all else.

All through the session, the “Big Three” additionally met weekly for breakfast, and Patrick avoided publicly criticizing Burrows, even when it appeared the Home was transferring slowly.

“The alignment of interests between the three this time, and the assessment that each made about getting along to some extent with the other, also helped Burrows,” stated Jim Henson, director of the Texas Politics Mission on the College of Texas at Austin. “That was clearly purposeful.”

Flashes of right-wing opposition quashed

Burrows additionally made early strikes to consolidate his help amongst Republicans, nearly all of whom had opposed his bid for speaker.

The Home took up and handed the voucher program early within the session, clearing away a high precedence of Abbott and Patrick’s that had torn Republicans aside prior to now. The vote additionally earned Burrows and each different pro-voucher Republican a pledge of help from President Donald Trump, whose endorsement is important with GOP major voters.

And Burrows freed members to pursue their priorities, no matter their seniority or whether or not they initially supported him, lawmakers stated.

Little, the anti-Burrows Republican who was serving his first time period, was thrust into the center of high-stakes negotiations over bail coverage, a high precedence of Abbott and Patrick’s, and over laws to curb private damage payouts.

Rep. Shelley Luther of Tom Bean, one other freshman Republican who had vowed to oppose the Burrows-Phelan management contingent, carried a conservative precedence by the Home to maintain vaccine producers liable for accidents brought on by their vaccines.

“The members that wanted to show up for work every day and represent their districts and roll up their sleeves and go to work found a speaker that was ready and eager to lock arms with them and put them to work,” GOP Rep. Jeff Leach of Allen, an in depth Burrows ally, stated. Those that got here to the Capitol intent on taking part in politics or elevating themselves, he added, have been “probably leaving Austin feeling pretty frustrated right now, and that’s a good thing.”

Any flashes of right-wing opposition all through the session have been rapidly dispatched.

In April, Rep. Brian Harrison, R-Midlothian and chief Home agitator, raised a movement to oust Burrows from the speakership. The movement was swatted down, with all however one different member rejecting it and Home lawmakers jeering throughout Harrison’s speech.

Burrows “used that as a tool to draw the caucus together,” Little stated.

Harrison, who sought to be the voice of the resistance, finally alienated a lot of his pure ideological allies, Henson stated. He posted incessantly on social media accusing the Home of not working — at the same time as members have been grinding by all-day committee hearings — and was brazenly accused by his colleagues of utilizing theatrics to lift his personal political profile.

Harrison’s “particular profile and people’s impression of him,” Henson stated, “disrupted any chance of a real, sustained, active opposition to Burrows from inside the caucus.”

In an announcement, Harrison stated that the “only thing the caucus was united in was passing big government liberalism,” pointing to what he solid as inadequate property tax reduction and a bloated funds, amongst different points.

“Texans deserve leaders willing to stand up to the swamp, even if it means standing alone,” Harrison stated. “My motion to vacate speech was the most enduring truth spoken on the floor all session, and I was speaking for every freedom-loving Texan who was betrayed.”

“Lurching toward more conservative representation”

By the final month of session, Republican priorities — together with socially conservative objects like a requirement that the Ten Commandments be posted in public college school rooms, payments focusing on transgender Texans, and a ban on variety, fairness and inclusion in Okay-12 colleges — have been successful approval within the Home at a gentle clip.

Burrows, whose document as a member targeted extra on property tax reduction and limiting the powers of progressive metropolis leaders, was quiet on most of the red-meat points that featured prominently on Patrick’s precedence checklist. As an alternative, Republican lawmakers stated, he let the members determine.

“My role as speaker is to call balls and strikes, managing the legislative process so the priorities of the chamber move forward when they have the support to pass,” Burrows stated. “And the truth is, the House and Senate found alignment on a number of long-debated issues. That’s not about falling in line — it’s about recognizing when the timing, support and momentum are there to act.”

Any a kind of objects failing might have triggered a struggle with the Senate. Their passage mirrored not solely the speaker’s agency conservative views, lawmakers stated, but additionally a chamber remade by final yr’s cutthroat primaries. Burrows accepted the Home’s urge for food for a extra bold conservative agenda, quite than preventing to protect the position it as soon as performed in moderating Patrick’s hardline impulses.

“The House is lurching toward more conservative representation,” Little stated. “Burrows appreciates that, and is using that moment to his advantage to move the policy initiatives that he has to move.”

Bargaining chips?

The Home’s shut alignment with Patrick, nonetheless, raised the query of whether or not Burrows had stood up for his chamber sufficient towards the Senate.

Although some argued that the ideological alignment between the our bodies meant Burrows didn’t should struggle again as a lot as earlier audio system, critics of the dynamic argued that the speaker let the Home and its members get run over by the Senate on just a few key points.

Some lawmakers argued that Burrows made a crucial tactical error in passing college vouchers so early within the session with out an ironclad settlement that the Senate would transfer in tandem to approve the Home’s public college funding bundle. Burrows had branded the 2 payments because the “Texas Two-Step,” in an effort to assist soothe lawmakers who have been open to supporting the voucher program however apprehensive about its impact on public colleges.

As an alternative, the college funding bundle obtained caught in negotiations that turned coloured by an unrelated Patrick precedence: a ban on all THC merchandise. Although Rep. Ken King, R-Canadian and chair of the influential State Affairs Committee, developed a sweeping regulatory framework that might have preserved some THC merchandise, the Home reverted his laws to a ban, with supporters pointing to a promised growth of Texas’ medical marijuana program as a counterbalance.

At first, the growth Patrick agreed to didn’t go so far as some Home lawmakers who supported the THC ban believed. That gave some the impression that the Home had been performed.

Nonetheless, Patrick later agreed to the core components of the Home’s proposed growth of the Texas Compassionate Use Program, and on college funding, lawmakers arrived at a compromise each side might endorse, with Burrows taking part in a central position within the negotiation.

Burrows argued that the voucher program all the time had the votes this session, and was by no means a “trade-off or a bargaining chip.”

“It was never a matter of trading this for that, or the House would have moved them in one bill or made them contingent on the other,” he stated. The college finance invoice was a large and complicated bundle that couldn’t be rushed, he stated, including, “It was never a matter of ‘if.’”

Leach, who spearheaded negotiations with the Senate on various high-priority payments, added that the openness between Burrows and Patrick “helps all of us do our jobs.”

“I was in those rooms, and the relationship between the chambers is strong,” Leach stated. “You’ve got House members and senators working together like we haven’t in a really long time.”

In a assertion final month, Patrick disputed the notion that both chamber “gets its way over the other” and famous that, with out cooperation from each, “nothing gets to the governor’s desk to be signed into law.”

“The Speaker and I don’t keep track of what’s a Senate bill or a House bill,” Patrick stated.

Some Democrats really feel “run over”

Whereas some Democrats discovered significant roles behind the scenes and a prepared viewers in Burrows, others left the session feeling betrayed.

One Democratic lawmaker, who requested anonymity to talk candidly, stated their “biggest regret” of the session was supporting Burrows for speaker.

“He couldn’t have won without us, and we’ve gotten run over on almost all of our major issue areas,” the lawmaker stated. “He ran on protecting the House from the lieutenant governor and the governor. That was his pitch to Democrats. That has certainly not happened. If anything, the governor and the lieutenant governor have way more influence and control of the House than they ever have.”

Different Democrats maintained their help for Burrows, arguing that he protected the establishment, acknowledged that he was speaker of all the Home and supplied area for Democrats to precise their preferences and dilute some conservative laws they largely didn’t help. Burrows particularly developed a relationship with Democratic members of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, lawmakers stated.

To show the Home’s resolve, lawmakers of each events pointed to the bail bundle, which the Home amended to win the requisite bipartisan help whereas rejecting two different proposals demanded by Abbott. Members additionally spotlighted the college finance invoice, which included Democratic priorities corresponding to pre-Okay funding and extra flexibility for varsity districts than the Senate had initially proposed.

The adjustments these payments underwent, the lawmakers stated, mirrored the power of Home Democrats and Republicans alike to make their mark on precedence laws.

“The fact that Dustin is a rock solid conservative should surprise no one,” Leach stated. Nonetheless, he added, if lawmakers “wanted to work and fight for their values, even if it’s stuff that he disagreed on, they were able to do so. Maybe not successfully — but the House was the people’s House, and that’s largely due to his leadership.”

The choice, as promised by Prepare dinner and the rebel motion, was to stop any Democratic payments from receiving a vote earlier than all conservative priorities handed, and to chop Democrats — who make up greater than 40 p.c of the Home — out of dealmaking fully.

As he gaveled out the session on Monday, Burrows famous how a lot the chamber had developed since January.

“We started the session as a House in a bit of uncertainty,” he stated as lawmakers embraced and readied themselves to depart Austin. “I believe that we ended in a much more unified and solid place.”

Disclosure: College of Texas at Austin has been a monetary supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan information group that’s funded partly by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Monetary supporters play no position within the Tribune’s journalism. Discover a full checklist of them right here.

---

Massive information: 20 extra audio system be part of the TribFest lineup! New additions embody Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of schooling and CEO of the Bipartisan Coverage Middle; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O’Rourke, former U.S. Consultant, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing accomplice at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer.

Get tickets.

TribFest 2025 is introduced by JPMorganChase.