A West Texas pecan farm fights to avoid wasting its water provide as neighbors promote it to rising cities

Subscribe to The Y’all — a weekly dispatch concerning the individuals, locations and insurance policies defining Texas, produced by Texas Tribune journalists residing in communities throughout the state.

---

FORT STOCKTON — Zachary Swick plucked a pecan from one of many 78,000 timber at a sprawling West Texas farm — a uncommon sight within the desert identified for oil rigs and pump jacks. He peeled away the pecan’s layers, leaving a stain on his fingers that may be troublesome to scrub off.

Sooner or later, Swick mentioned, there won’t be any pecans left to peel.

Swick is the farm supervisor at Belding Farms, which has been owned for many years by the Cockrell household. Annually, the farm produces 5 million kilos of the long-lasting Texas nut.

The farm sits atop a reservoir of underground water used to provide the pecans for the reason that Sixties. The farm shares the water with its neighbors. Beneath Texas regulation, all property house owners have the suitable to make use of the water beneath their boots.

A kind of neighbors is Fort Stockton Holdings, an organization established by oil baron and one-time gubernatorial candidate Clayton Williams. Fort Stockton Holdings, for years, has sought to promote its share of the water to West Texas’ rising cities. The 50-year deal between the corporate and the cities of Midland, Abilene and San Angelo would change water from the aquifers for $261 million.

Midland is the capital of the Permian Basin, a 61-county area that holds the state’s huge oil reserves. During the last decade, Midland has added 10,000 individuals. About 138,000 individuals name it house. And extra are anticipated because the oil business reveals no indicators of slowing.

“Our goal was to secure a long-term, sustainable water supply that requires minimal treatment and can meet the city’s future needs,” Midland Mayor Lori Blong mentioned in an announcement.

Fort Stockton Holdings didn’t return requests for remark.

Belding Farms has requested the Center Pecos Groundwater Conservation District, the native governing physique tasked with managing water rights, to guard the water to make sure it isn’t swallowed up by the deal. Fort Stockton Holdings will promote 28,400 acre-feet of water per 12 months as a part of the contract, greater than twice as a lot because the farm makes use of on an annual foundation.

Earlier this month, the groundwater district rejected Belding Farms’ request to place extra guidelines and costs across the exports. Nonetheless, the choice is just one think about a yearslong feud between the 2 highly effective households.

The battle is a harbinger of the water wars the state will face because the inhabitants continues to swell. By 2060, Texas is anticipated so as to add as much as 14 million extra individuals, based on a research by Texas 2036 — and there’s not sufficient water for everybody, not to mention agriculture and business, consultants say. Already, the state has misplaced its sugar business to a dearth of water within the Rio Grande Valley. Swick doesn’t need pecans to be subsequent.

“We’re mining a resource that is, in essence, being depleted, and that’s our biggest concern,” Swick mentioned. “Will that water be as consistent as it has been in the past?”

Pecans are a Texas staple. It’s the solely nut indigenous to the state. The tree dates again to prehistoric occasions, based on the Texas State Historic Affiliation. The Texas Legislature in 1919 declared pecans the official state tree.

The Cockrell household started planting pecan timber within the Sixties. At the moment, about 40 staff work year-round to are inclined to the farm, from the orchard supervisor and foremen to mechanics.

The season begins every year in March. Employees stimulate cross-pollination all year long. The pecans mature throughout the summer time and fall. And within the winter, the farm shucks the timber.

Farming the two,200 acres requires water — and a number of it. The farm makes use of between 11,000 acre-feet and 12,100 acre-feet of water yearly. The farm employs totally different irrigation mechanisms to maintain the farm hydrated effectively, together with a way known as land leveling, during which extra water swimming pools on a terrace between the timber to forestall run-off. The farm additionally has cement canals alongside the property that maintain the water and cease it from seeping into the soil.

Over time, the farm has bolstered its efforts to preserve water. In 2022, it spent about $455,000 to put in a sprinkler system that covers 96 acres. As a substitute of a mist, the sprinklers shoot out a stream of water to forestall evaporation. Additionally scattered throughout the farm are soil moisture probes that monitor whether or not the bottom must be watered.

Swick mentioned that he and the farm attempt to be proactive in conserving water as a result of a dry spell may lead to a disaster for the farm and the encompassing neighborhood. A specific concern is the wells, Swick mentioned, which aren’t in a position to pump water if the aquifers are under a sure threshold.

“If we are not proactive, the ramifications of that could be huge,” he mentioned.” We may lose giant sections of our farm if not all of it.”

Texas has an extended historical past of personal property rights, which incorporates water. Because the state’s inhabitants has grown, bigger cities have turned to rural landowners to purchase their water. Groundwater districts, like Center Pecos, can act as an arbiter.

The 98 groundwater conservation districts, that are principally in rural or sparsely populated communities, handle the water provide. Groundwater districts are the state’s “preferred method of groundwater management in order to protect property rights,” an replace to an outdated mandate often known as the rule of seize that allowed landowners to pump water as they wished.

The battle between Belding Farms and Fort Stockton Holdings started in 2009 when the latter first tried to promote roughly 50,000 acre-feet yearly. One acre-foot of water is about 325,851 gallons of water.

The groundwater district initially rejected the request, partly as a result of the exports wanted extra protections connected to it. On the time, then-mayor of Fort Stockton, Ruben Falcon, mentioned the residents felt “that the future water supply is threatened by having a large amount of water transferred out of the aquifer.”

In 2017, Fort Stockton Holdings and the groundwater district reached an settlement to permit the holding firm to pump and promote 28,400 acre-feet of water. That’s when Belding Farms sued the groundwater district, which controls the permits for export agreements just like the one between Fort Stockton Holding and the opposite cities.

In complete, the farm has sued 5 occasions and petitioned the groundwater district to ascertain controls across the exports, together with defining so-called unreasonable impacts. Unreasonable impacts would outline the factors at which the aquifer is simply too low. The farm additionally requested the district to impose a 20-cent export price for each 1,000 gallons. These collections would supply monetary compensation to landowners affected by unreasonable impacts, resembling having to deepen their wells. The groundwater district rejected each in its October session.

Two of the circumstances reached the Supreme Courtroom of Texas. The primary is the settlement settlement between Fort Stockton Holdings and the groundwater district, which allowed the corporate to promote the water. The second case issues a renewal allow for Fort Stockton Holdings, which might want to proceed to promote the water.

Groundwater District board members say they need to grant firms and people the flexibility to make use of the groundwater as they see match, including it has been caught within the crosshairs of a generational dispute.

In 2012, the Texas Supreme Courtroom dominated in an unrelated case that groundwater districts couldn’t severely restrict landowners from pumping water. On the time, the legal professional for the Edwards Aquifer Authority mentioned the ruling would “make life much more complicated for groundwater districts.”

“When you’re giving big chunks of the pie, it’s like you have to keep giving big chunks of that pie out because if you start telling people no, you’re going to get sued,” mentioned Robert Mace, govt director at The Meadows Heart for Water and the Surroundings. “That’s a case the district’s probably going to lose.”

Nonetheless, landowners who drill a water effectively that’s throughout the jurisdiction of a groundwater conservation district should register it. Groundwater conservation districts challenge permits for business wells or wells that pump giant volumes of water from the aquifer. In addition they challenge spacing, drilling and manufacturing necessities.

Groundwater districts decide their provide by monitoring the water underground. Each 5 years, they submit a report back to the Texas Water Growth Board that calculates the accessible water for the subsequent 50 years. The groundwater district makes use of that data for regional planning and the way a lot water could be permitted for pumping.

Justin Thompson, a analysis assistant professor on the Bureau of Financial Geology on the College of Texas, mentioned the purpose was to maximise the usage of the accessible water whereas balancing that in opposition to defending the availability.

“They have an unenviable task,” he mentioned.

Ty Edwards, the overall supervisor of the Center Pecos Groundwater Conservation District, mentioned he sees his function much less as a regulator and extra as a relationship supervisor. The groundwater conservation district should symbolize and shield the pursuits of groundwater customers.

If a landowner disagrees with the groundwater district’s determination, they will strategy the board members and request modifications. Edwards mentioned that’s the level of a neighborhood governing company.

Three swimming pools of water stream beneath the soil in Fort Stockton, a geographically distinctive make-up that isn’t frequent in Texas. The Edwards Trinity aquifer is closest to the floor. The Rustler aquifer is under it. The Capitan Reef Advanced aquifer is the deepest one.

The farm and holding firm should not the one water rights house owners in Pecos County. Within the County, 4,000 wells faucet into the aquifer. Nearly 3,000 of these belong to landowners who registered their wells. Almost 1,000 are permitted.

100 wells make up the vast majority of the water use, together with Fort Stockton Holdings, Belding Farms, town of Fort Stockton, one other pecan farm and a detention facility.

Final 12 months, a mixed 42,205 acre-feet of water was pumped from the Edwards-Trinity aquifer. That’s greater than Midland and Ector counties, which pumped a mixed 25,000 acre-feet of groundwater in 2021, based on the regional water plan submitted by 32 counties to the Water Growth Board.

Fort Stockton Holdings’ cope with the cities will add 24,800 acre-feet extra pumping yearly. Edwards mentioned that the groundwater district evaluated pumping ranges through the years and decided that the affect on the aquifer wouldn’t be a danger. He mentioned the monitoring mechanisms are protecting of the aquifer.

For the reason that deal was first proposed, Fort Stockton Holdings and the Cockrell household armed themselves with legal professionals, scientists and consultants who’ve sparred for years, disputing the information they current to one another. Edwards mentioned the information Belding Farms offered helped them arrive at their determination.

Though it’s not against exports outright, the Cockrell household argues this quantity may drain the aquifer quicker than it might recharge. They mentioned the groundwater conservation district’s monitoring skill just isn’t strong sufficient and may solely present estimates of the water ranges. Consultants additionally pointed to extreme agricultural pumping within the Nineteen Fifties, which prompted the native springs, known as Comanche Springs, to dry up.

Edwards, who volunteered at Belding Farms in his youth, mentioned the water provide was not in peril. He mentioned the historic knowledge going again many years portrays a wholesome aquifer able to withstanding the added demand.

“We’re not going to let their wells go dry,” Edwards mentioned.

On the groundwater district’s October assembly, tensions had been excessive. The 11 board members sat round a convention desk beneath a wide-screen TV the place scientists, legal professionals and consultants gathered and waited their flip to talk.

Reverse the TV, the Cockrell household’s legal professional, Ryan Reed, sat in a folding chair. Behind him sat Carlos Rubenstein, a former commissioner for the Texas Fee on Environmental High quality, erstwhile chair and board member of the Texas Water Growth Board, now a advisor for the household and farm.

Reed as soon as once more requested the groundwater district to think about setting stricter guidelines and defining unreasonable impacts. What he’s asking just isn’t included within the regulation. It could be as much as the groundwater district to ascertain.

Fort Stockton Holding’s legal professional spoke subsequent, calling the request a fearmongering tactic. He mentioned their research present the aquifer can maintain the added pumping.

Board members mentioned they might convene the residents and focus on including export charges at their discretion, not the 20-cent quantity the Cockrell household advisable.

After the assembly, Edwards sat in his workplace with a plate of barbecue in entrance of him. A groundwater discipline technician cooked the meal.

He mentioned Texas regulation compels them to deal with groundwater customers equally and that the Legislature doesn’t give them sufficient tooth to tackle each battle. Within the meantime, he mentioned he trusts the science.

“Nobody likes the fact that water is going to leave Pecos County,” Edwards mentioned. “None of the board members like it. You’re not going to find anybody in the community that supports them moving water out of the county, but we didn’t write the laws.”

Shortly after the assembly, Reed mentioned the groundwater district’s determination was shortsighted in refusing to comply with the farm’s phrases.

Reed didn’t say what the farm would do subsequent, solely that the struggle was removed from over.

Disclosure: Edwards Aquifer Authority, Texas 2036 and Texas State Historic Affiliation have been monetary supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan information group that’s funded partly by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Monetary supporters play no function within the Tribune’s journalism. Discover a full listing of them right here.