Join The Transient, The Texas Tribune’s day by day e-newsletter that retains readers on top of things on essentially the most important Texas information.
Normally, it’s nothing greater than a trivia night time factoid: Texas is certainly one of simply two states with two excessive courts, one for civil and one for legal circumstances.
However on Thursday night time, this peculiar quirk of judicial administration could have saved a person’s life, at the very least briefly.
The Court docket of Legal Appeals, Texas’ highest court docket for legal circumstances, has dominated, repeatedly and definitively, that Robert Roberson ought to be executed for killing his 2-year-old daughter in 2002.
This week, the Texas Supreme Court docket, which handles civil circumstances, intervened and stayed the execution, after an unprecedented Hail Mary from a bipartisan group of legislators. That is, specialists imagine, the primary time in Texas historical past that one excessive court docket stopped an execution that was already greenlit by one other.
This legislative end-run across the judiciary is the most recent chapter in a brewing energy battle between Texas’ three branches of presidency. Already, a vendetta from the manager department within the type of Texas Legal professional Basic Ken Paxton, resulted in major challenges unseating three of the 9 judges.
Outgoing judges Sharon Keller, Barbara Hervey and Michelle Slaughter had been among the many 5 who voted to permit Roberson’s execution to proceed. If even one of many incoming judges takes a special stance on the details of Roberson’s case, it may open the door to future litigation and shift the votes in his favor. However a conservative landslide would possibly additional shut off hope at a court docket that has voted towards him repeatedly.
Roberson can’t be executed for at the very least 90 days after the state requests a brand new execution date, which received’t occur till the open authorized questions are resolved. Unprecedented judicial interventions from the manager and legislative branches, in addition to an sudden disagreement between the 2 excessive courts, has thrown many issues about Roberson’s state of affairs into upheaval.
The query earlier than the Texas Supreme Court docket proper now will not be about Roberson’s guilt or innocence, however about “the separation of powers at a high level,” Justice Evan Younger wrote within the concurring opinion that held off the execution. As to the trail that these legislators have taken Texas down, he warned, “we do not have clear precedent.”
A very powerful Texas information,
despatched weekday mornings.
Two-headed monster
Texas’ bifurcated court docket system dates again to the Civil Battle period, when splitting sacred establishments down the center was apparently all the trend. Beleaguered by a backlog of circumstances, the Texas Supreme Court docket acquired an help from a newly created Court docket of Appeals to listen to legal circumstances.
Greater than 150 years later, Texas’ two excessive courts largely function alongside one another with out battle. However once they do run up towards one another, it creates “a game of jurisdictional hot potato between us and our constitutional twin,” then-Texas Supreme Court docket Justice Don Willett wrote in 2011.
This newest conflict between the 2 courts could as soon as once more spark conversations concerning the energy stability between these two co-equals. Traditionally, demise penalty circumstances have been the unique purview of the Court docket of Legal Appeals, with the court docket attracting worldwide consideration round high-profile executions.
Texas has the very best per capita execution charge of any state after Oklahoma, which, notably, is the one different state that has two excessive courts.
“Without capital punishment, I’m not sure there’s any reason to have a separate Supreme Court,” former Court docket of Legal Appeals decide Elsa Alcala mentioned in an interview. “That’s how they justify their existence.”
Government interference
However earlier than this week, it wasn’t the demise penalty that had the Court docket of Legal Appeals within the information this election season.
In 2021, the Court docket of Legal Appeals dominated 8-1 towards Paxton, discovering that his workplace should get permission from county prosecutors to go after alleged circumstances of voter fraud. Not not like the place the Roberson case has now ended up, the difficulty at hand was the separation of powers — the manager department interfering with the judicial department by prosecuting election circumstances with out invitation.
Undeterred by the trouble to examine and stability his energy, Paxton vowed revenge, promising to “get rid of everybody” however the one decide who sided with him, the Tribune reported final 12 months.
The three sitting judges up for reelection this 12 months are all staunch conservatives with reputations for being robust on crime and robust on the demise penalty. They’ve almost a century of expertise on the bench mixed, together with Keller who has served on the bench since 1994 and as presiding decide since 2000.
All three had been unseated by major challengers, two of whom say they had been hand-picked by Paxton.
Gina Parker, who’s operating to switch Hervey, is a lawyer with no earlier judicial expertise who owns a dental manufacturing firm. She is operating towards Democrat Nancy Mulder, a Dallas County felony court docket decide.
Lee Finley, who’s operating to switch Slaughter, is a legal protection legal professional who additionally has no judicial expertise. He’s operating towards Dallas County Legal District Court docket Choose Chika Anyiam.
For Keller’s seat, Republican David Schenk says he was not recruited by Paxton. As former decide for the state’s Fifth District Court docket of Appeals, Schenk has twice dominated towards Paxton in his felony conviction circumstances, and beforehand chaired the State Fee on Judicial Conduct. He’s operating towards Travis County prosecutor Holly Davis, who beforehand labored as employees legal professional for the court docket.
After the first ousted all three of the sitting judges, Hervey, who had been on the bench since 2001, informed the Tribune that this interference from one other department of presidency nervous her about the way forward for the court docket.
“Darth Vader is not supposed to win the war in those movies,” she mentioned on the time.
Legislative end-run
In 2002, 2-year-old Nikki Curtis died at a hospital in East Texas. On the time, medical doctors, nurses, legislation enforcement and, crucially, a decide, believed she had been the sufferer of violent little one abuse from her father, Roberson.
Within the 22 years since, extra proof has come out, each about Curtis’ brief life and the analysis used to condemn Roberson to demise. Texas courts have waffled on whether or not he ought to be executed or not, however every time, it has come right down to the identical place: The Texas Court docket of Legal Appeals.
Two judges, Hervey and Keller, have been on the court docket the entire time this case has performed out. Regardless of numerous authorized mechanisms, new methods, new proof, new angles, in the end, every time, a majority of the nine-judge panel has determined he should die. The newest vote was Thursday night time after Paxton’s workplace appealed a Travis County decide’s non permanent restraining order halting the execution. A slim majority of the Court docket of Legal Appeals overrode that ruling and voted to permit the execution to proceed.
Three of these 5 votes got here from judges who won’t be on the court docket come January. If even one of many incoming judges views the case in a different way than the particular person they’re changing, the 5-4 stability of opinions may probably flip in Roberson’s favor and create new hope for future litigation in entrance of the court docket. However with two self-proclaimed Paxton allies within the operating, help for the state’s place may achieve extra power after January.
None of this might even be up for consideration if members of the Texas Home hadn’t used their energy because the legislative department to attempt to throw the brakes on the judiciary. Whereas it’s not instantly clear what future authorized avenues Roberson’s group would possibly pursue, contemplating how a lot is in flux with the court docket proper now, Alcala mentioned it was clear this was “not just a delay tactic for the sake of delay.”
“I think everyone involved is doing the best job they can to try to get justice in what appears to be a potentially innocent person who was convicted with junk science,” she mentioned.
Whether or not this case will impression voters in these often low-attention down-ballot races in November stays to be seen. However the stakes for Roberson are excessive, and the facility of 1 decide is evident on this case already.
Earlier this month, the Court docket of Legal Appeals dominated 5-4 to overturn the life sentence of a DeSoto man convicted of inflicting irreversible mind injury by shaking a 1-year-old. Within the ruling, the court docket discovered that if the state’s specialists had been referred to as to testify right now, they “would be confronted with twenty years of reputable scientific studies and publications that, if graphed, continually point away from their stated positions. As a result, “it is more likely than not he would not have been convicted.”
Hervey authored that opinion, totally rejecting the shaken child premise in that case. Just some days later, she joined 4 others and voted to permit Roberson’s execution to go ahead.
