“Angel Reese Always Comes Off as the Victim”: Dan Patrick Places Forth Harsh Criticism of the Rookie on Her Rivalry With Caitlin Clark

Followers witness a fiery improvement each time Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark are in the identical area. Be it their Nationwide Championship recreation or their first WNBA encounter, their face-offs to this point have been marked by controversies that appeal to a number of opinions from the followers in addition to analysts. One thing related transpired on Sunday when the Indiana Fever hosted the Chicago Sky on the Gainbridge Fieldhouse. After Reese was known as for a flagrant foul on Clark, she expressed her dissatisfaction with the officiating. And sportscaster Dan Patrick has a problem with that.

Within the post-game press convention, Angel Reese even instructed that the referees favor the NCAA Division I all-time main scorer. Evaluating her stance, Patrick drew one vital side of their rivalry. “Everybody had an opinion on and Angel Reese is stirring this up. Angel Reese always comes off as the victim and she’s leaning into being the bad guy,” he mentioned on The Dan Patrick Present.

The feedback come after Reese’s contrasting reactions whereas addressing her rivalry with Caitlin Clark. The sufferer angle that Patrick is referring to is her media handle on March 31, simply after LSU’s Elite Eight encounter towards Iowa. Opening up in regards to the on-line abuse, she additionally clarified that there is no such thing as a dangerous blood between her and the 6-foot-guard.

Nonetheless, everybody received to see a seemingly completely different Angel Reese within the WNBA. After celebrating Chennedy Carter’s tough physicality towards Clark of their Commissioner Cup face-off, she went on and embraced the “bad guy” position in entrance of the media. She solidified that picture not too long ago by exhibiting up in her second WNBA encounter towards Fever carrying Joker-themed Reebok sneakers.

Patrick additional identified what number of girls within the WNBA, together with Reese, have benefitted from Clark’s recognition. He mentioned, “Angel Reese needs Caitlin Clark. Caitlin Clark doesn’t need Angel Reese.” He additionally acknowledged that many informal followers received to see who Reese was as a result of her matchup towards Clark.

Whereas many view her flagrant foul vs Caitlin Clark as uncalled for, there are some who agree along with her and see it as a “basketball play”. 

Angel Reese has help from sure sections of the media

After Emmanuel Acho and Doug Gottlieb, Stephen A. Smith grew to become one other eminent analyst who justified Reese’s on-court actions. The sports activities journalist mentioned, “I will say this: It was a basketball play. Yes, Angel Reese is right about that.” Nonetheless, he additionally opined that the officers have been proper of their place in judging the character of the play and popping out with applicable actions.

He additional added, “But what they called against her in terms of upgrading it to a flagrant-1 is exactly what they would’ve done in the NBA as well. She can be upset about it, but it’s a hit to the head, and that’s what they’re doing in this day and age. The call is correct.” 

The opinions on this Angel Reese-Caitlin Clark episode will proceed to return to the floor within the upcoming days. Not solely the followers but in addition analysts have an interest within the attractive character of their rivalry. With the 2 groups set to face off as soon as once more on June 23, it is going to be fascinating to see what the following chapter unfolds.

Keep tuned for extra such updates. And to observe what Shaq’s ex-agent, Leonard Armato, has to say in regards to the Reese-Clark rivalry and extra, watch this video.