Join The Transient, The Texas Tribune’s every day publication that retains readers in control on essentially the most important Texas information.
In a state the place the demise penalty is as ingrained as cowboy boots and conservative politics, information of Robert Roberson’s demise sentence broke by means of in Texas after the rarest of phenoms: a loud, bipartisan effort that bypassed the governor’s workplace to avoid wasting a person from deadly injection.
For years, the appeals of Roberson’s capital homicide conviction for the 2002 demise of his chronically unwell, 2-year-old daughter had lumbered by means of the courts, tracing a byzantine course of that always fails to register with residents of the nation’s execution capital, the place 591 inmates have been put to demise within the state since capital punishment was reinstated in 1976.
However whereas lawmakers have been making historic interventions, many Texans took notice of the silence by the individual historically empowered to step in on the final minute: Gov. Greg Abbott.
“Abbott’s silence is deafening,” stated Brandon Rottinghaus, a professor of political science on the College of Houston.
In any case, Abbott had at his disposal the facility to grant a 30-day reprieve for Roberson, whose attorneys declare was wrongfully convicted based mostly on junk science. A U.S. Supreme Courtroom Justice urged him to take that step. If Abbott had, there would have been no frantic and unprecedented rush by lawmakers to subject a subpoena of Roberson after which go to courtroom to dam the execution — first to a Travis County decide, then to Texas’ two excessive courts earlier than Roberson’s execution was lastly known as off.
There’s been no public assertion from Abbott about Roberson’s case earlier than or since. If the execution had gone ahead, Roberson would have been the primary individual within the nation to be put to demise in a shaken child syndrome case, a prognosis that has come into query lately. A number of requests for remark to the governor’s workplace by The Texas Tribune went unanswered.
The silence “certainly signals his willingness to go his own way against the Legislature and also reflects that, like Gov. Perry before him, the realization that being tough on crime is an essential element of muscularity for national Republicans,” Rottinghaus stated.
Silence on executions, common
In contrast to the Hollywood picture of a governor making a frantic cellphone name to cease an execution, the truth, particularly in Texas, is way much less dramatic. Texas governors can solely act on a advice of clemency from their very own appointees to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. Or they will go for the 30-day reprieve.
Crucial Texas information,
despatched weekday mornings.
In line with the Related Press, the Texas parole board has really helpful clemency in a demise row case solely six instances because the state resumed executions in 1982. In three of these instances, demise row inmates had their sentences commuted to life in jail. In two of the instances, Perry rejected the parole board’s advice to commute a demise sentence to life in jail, and the 2 prisoners have been executed.
However regardless of that restricted energy, Abbott could have inadvertently raised the Texas public’s expectations of intervention final yr. That’s when he was fast to leap in publicly after a jury convicted an Austin man of fatally capturing a Black Lives Matter protester. Abbott posted on social media that he would rapidly search a pardon. The parole board did suggest a pardon a yr later, and Abbott made good on his promise.
However veteran courtroom watchers say Abbott’s silence on even a excessive profile demise penalty case shouldn’t be out of the peculiar.
“It’s typical,” stated Elsa Alcala, who served for seven years as a decide on the Texas Courtroom of Felony Appeals, the state’s highest felony courtroom, earlier than stepping down in 2018. “Usually, the governor doesn’t get involved.”
Thus far, greater than 60 executions have been carried out whereas Abbott has been governor, a fraction of the greater than 200 that occurred when former Gov. Rick Perry was in workplace. That’s the results of elevated judicial scrutiny on demise row instances and extra prosecutors in search of life in jail as an alternative of the demise penalty.
Abbott has solely commuted one demise sentence. In 2018, he spared the lifetime of Thomas “Bart” Whitaker, who masterminded a murder-for-hire scheme that resulted within the demise of his mom and youthful brother and injured his development firm govt father, who in the end forgave his son. Whitaker’s case was diminished to a life sentence.
“Even going back to Ann Richards, I don’t think there’s a history of Texas governors in capital cases giving reprieves,” stated Kenneth Williams, the Fred Grey Endowed Chair for Civil Rights and Constitutional Regulation at Texas Tech College. “They rarely do in capital cases.”
Longtime Texas political observer Cal Jillson agreed.
“Governors at least going back to George W. Bush, in the case of a mentally challenged inmate named Oliver Cruz, and Rick Perry, in the case of Cameron Todd Willingham, have been reluctant to intervene in death penalty cases for fear of appearing ‘soft on crime,’” stated Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist College.
The added indisputable fact that Abbott, earlier than he was first elected governor in 2014, was the state’s longest-serving legal professional basic, whose workplace is charged with making certain a trial courtroom’s demise sentence is carried out, may assist clarify why Texans don’t hear a lot from him concerning a person’s case.
“He defended these cases, so that may weigh on him as governor,” stated Williams, the Texas Tech College regulation professor, including that Abbott’s lack of intervention on this or some other case shouldn’t be out of step with governors in different states.
“Most governors are reluctant to grant any kind of clemency after there’s been conviction,” he stated. “I don’t think they want the blowback in that.”.
How the case unfolded
Roberson, 57, of Palestine, was convicted of his daughter’s demise in 2003 after an post-mortem decided his daughter, Nikki, who had been unwell with a fever, had died of shaking and blows. Investigators believed that Roberson’s impassive demeanor was additional proof of his guilt. Roberson has since been recognized as having autism, which may clarify Roberson’s habits on the time. A police detective whose investigation despatched the East Texas man to demise row, now helps Roberson’s claims of innocence.
On Wednesday, as each the Texas parole board and the Texas Courtroom of Felony Appeals rejected Roberson’s last-minute appeals, the Home committee members issued their subpoena, arguing that solely Roberson may present distinctive testimony on Texas’ pioneering 2013 junk science regulation — which Roberson had tried, and failed, to make use of to show his innocence. Final month, 80 Texas lawmakers, together with supporters of the demise penalty, wrote Texas parole board members in assist of Roberson’s request for clemency.
The regulation is designed to permit defendants an avenue to show their innocence in the event that they have been convicted based mostly on science that’s later proven to be defective. In actual fact, no Texas demise row inmate has efficiently used the regulation to acquire a brand new trial, main the Texas Defender Service to conclude that the statute “is not operating as the Texas Legislature intended.”
The steps legislators took to halt the execution have been unprecedented, and drew some complaints of overstepping their authority.
“I will absolutely defend what we did,” state Rep. Brian Harrison, R-Midlothian, a member of the Home jurisprudence committee who started wanting into Roberson’s instances a number of months in the past on the advice of a colleague. “We have to protect the integrity of the criminal justice system.”
Harrison confirmed that lawmakers contacted Abbott after their subpoena was issued however didn’t wish to focus on specifics of these conversations, describing them solely as “professional and productive.”
Lots of those that tracked the Roberson saga this week have been struck extra by the actions of the Legislature than the inaction of Abbott.
“What is unusual in the case of Robert Roberson is not so much Abbott’s silence, as the bipartisan effort to slow this execution at least long enough to take a closer look,” Jillson stated.
However Amanda Marzullo, the previous govt director of the Texas Defender Service, stated it was crucial for the Legislature to step in, on condition that the usage of clemency by American governors has waned.
“We have seen a massive atrophy in the clemency power,” she stated. “It was something governors did all the time.”
She pointed to how greater than 200 years in the past, a governor’s pardon energy was used extra actually because demise was typically the punishment for a lot lesser crimes.
“That is how this method was designed,” Marzullo stated. “So no one branch is doing all of the work in a particular sector.”
