Studying Time: 4 minutes
Blake Vigorous has filed an amended criticism towards Justin Baldoni.
This authorized replace comes as Baldoni’s $400 million lawsuit towards Vigorous, her husband, and the New York Instances (after the NYT reported on his alleged sexual misconduct) exhibits no finish in sight.
In line with Vigorous’s attorneys, she was not the one one to voice complaints about Baldoni’s alleged habits on the set of It Ends With Us.
The existence of different complaints might fly within the face of Baldoni’s timeline — and his declare that Vigorous fabricated her complaints as a part of a inventive wrestle.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35109/351093c4be914288d5ee0fd5c58db8e3b65f3401" alt="Blake Vigorous Amended Criticism: I am Not Baldoni’s Solely Accuser! Blake Vigorous Amended Criticism: I am Not Baldoni’s Solely Accuser!"
Blake Vigorous has filed an amended criticism
Placing collectively a case to file a lawsuit can take time. However even then, typically individuals have to replace their courtroom case forward of trial.
On Tuesday, February 18, Blake Vigorous filed an amended criticism in New York federal courtroom. The 163-page doc provides to her December 31 lawsuit towards Justin Baldoni.
Folks experiences that, in line with her attorneys Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, the submitting “provides significant additional evidence and corroboration of her original claims” and likewise “includes previously undisclosed communications” involving Vigorous, Sony, Wayfarer Studios and “numerous other witnesses.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b58e/0b58ef4ebaeab74641eefd913f4a84a226c76c59" alt="Blake Lively on August 8, 2024."
Moreover, the attorneys famous that Blake Vigorous’s amended criticism “also added a new claim for defamation.”
They added that the defamation declare is “based on the repeated false statements the defendants have made about Ms. Lively since she filed her original complaint, and adds Jed Wallace and his company as defendants.”
Wallace is suing Vigorous after she described Baldoni as utilizing his PR agency to run a smear marketing campaign towards her. Late final 12 months, many noticed screenshots of communications wherein he seemed to be doing precisely that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4b85/b4b85bcb612d2fd95e0cbe495464094988f3822f" alt="Blake Lively on August 8, 2024."
What does Blake Vigorous’s amended criticism say?
One portion of the amended criticism has attorneys for Blake Vigorous write that Baldoni’s “false narrative crumbles under the indisputable truth.”
The submitting notes that Vigorous “was not alone in complaining about Mr. Baldoni and raised her concerns contemporaneously as they arose in 2023.”
That is a crucial level. Her attorneys proceed, saying that she spoke about this in 2023 and “not in connection with some imagined power play for control of the film in 2024.” Baldoni’s argument has been that Vigorous fabricated allegations of misconduct as a part of a inventive energy wrestle, however her staff says that this doesn’t match the timeline.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b0f1/2b0f16524929059c9c543944afdc03faa75c5fce" alt="Blake Lively on August 8, 2024."
Moreover, a spokesperson for Blake Vigorous specifies that the amended criticism “details the corroboration that backs up Blake’s original sexual harassment and retaliation concerns.”
In line with this assertion, the submitting demonstrates that “other women confided in Blake about their discomfort and fear of coming forward, and their concern about the current public vitriol.”
There have been indications throughout the preliminary press tour for It Ends With Us that a few of Blake Vigorous’s costars had been reluctant to debate Justin Baldoni in any method. It’s attainable that a few of them will find yourself testifying in courtroom in a 12 months — and giving depositions earlier than then.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9ca3/d9ca3c5764aec08d731c5765a85f63448cba388c" alt="Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively on February 16, 2025."
This won’t go to trial till Could 2026
This subsequent 12 months or so will doubtless be filled with back-and-forth filings within the courtroom.
The choose has discouraged each events from saying something to taint a possible jury pool. That has not stopped Vigorous and her husband from making a short SNL cameo, or Baldoni from publishing alleged, cherrypicked texts to a web site that appears devoted to influencing public opinion.
Public opinion is a fickle factor and simply influenced, particularly by means of disinformation vectors like TikTok. There isn’t any telling what this case will appear to be within the eye of on a regular basis individuals (who haven’t learn the authorized filings) by the point that it goes to trial.
Justin Baldoni’s billionaire backer threatened to guard Wayfarer “like Israel protected itself from Hamas” if Blake Vigorous and Ryan Reynolds dared to talk up months after It Ends With Us wrapped.
“There were 39,000 dead bodies. There will be two dead bodies when I’m done.”
— Molly McAleer (@molls.bsky.social) February 19, 2025 at 10:01 AM
And individuals who haven’t learn the authorized filings are lacking some key particulars. For instance, Steve Sarowitz, a accomplice in Wayfarer Studios, seemingly vowed to “protect” the studio with large retaliation.
In line with Vigorous’s submitting, Sarowitz vowed to a witness to go after Vigorous and Reynolds in the event that they spoke out towards Baldoni. “I will protect the studio like Israel protected itself from Hamas,” Sarowitz allegedly threatened, referring to the genocide perpetrated in Gaza. “There were 39,000 dead bodies. There will be two dead bodies when I’m done.”
If this quoted textual content is true, it would clarify Baldoni’s large lawsuit towards Vigorous, Reynolds, and a serious newspaper. And, if different allegations are true, this type of backing might hypothetically clarify why an actor and director might really feel that he might act nevertheless he needs in direction of an A-list costar with impunity.