Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat and veteran of fight missions in Iraq, stated she had considerations about Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s option to be director of nationwide intelligence.
“I think she’s compromised,” Duckworth stated on CNN’s “State of the Union,” citing Gabbard’s 2017 journey to Syria, the place she held talks with Syrian President Bashar Assad. Gabbard was a Democratic Home member from Hawaii on the time.
“The U.S. intelligence community has identified her as having troubling relationships with America’s foes. And so my worry is that she couldn’t pass a background check,” Duckworth stated.
Gabbard, who stated final month she is becoming a member of the Republican Celebration, has served within the Military Nationwide Guard for greater than 20 years. She was deployed to Iraq and Kuwait and, in response to the Hawaii Nationwide Guard, obtained a Fight Medical Badge in 2005 for “participation in combat operations under enemy hostile fire in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom III.”
Duckworth’s feedback drew instant backlash from Republicans.
“For her to say ridiculous and outright dangerous words like that is wrong,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin, a Republican from Oklahoma, stated on CNN, difficult Duckworth to retract her phrases. “That’s the most dangerous thing she could say — is that a United States lieutenant colonel in the United States Army is compromised and is an asset of Russia.”
In latest days, different Democrats have accused Gabbard with out proof of being a “Russian asset.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, has claimed, with out providing particulars, that Gabbard is in Russian President Vladimir “Putin’s pocket.”
Mullin and others say the criticism from Democrats is rooted in the truth that Gabbard left their social gathering and has grow to be a Trump ally. Democrats say they fear that Gabbard’s choice as nationwide intelligence chief endangers ties with allies and offers Russia a win.
Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat simply elected to the Senate, stated he wouldn’t describe Gabbard as a Russian asset, however stated she had “very questionable judgment.”
“The problem is if our foreign allies don’t trust the head of our intelligence agencies, they’ll stop sharing information with us,” Schiff stated on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
Gabbard in 2022 endorsed one in all Russia’s justifications for invading Ukraine: the existence of dozens of U.S.-funded biolabs engaged on a number of the world’s nastiest pathogens. The labs are a part of a world effort to regulate outbreaks and cease bioweapons, however Moscow claimed Ukraine was utilizing them to create lethal bioweapons. Gabbard stated she simply voiced considerations about defending the labs.
Gabbard additionally has urged that Russia had authentic safety considerations in deciding to invade Ukraine, given its want to affix NATO.
Republican Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri stated he thought it was “totally ridiculous” that Gabbard was being solid as a Russian asset for having totally different political opinions.
“It’s insulting. It’s a slur, quite frankly. There’s no evidence that she’s a asset of another country,” he stated on NBC.
Sen. James Lankford, one other Oklahoma Republican, acknowledged having “lots of questions” for Gabbard because the Senate considers her nomination to guide the intelligence providers. Lankford stated on NBC that he desires to ask Gabbard about her assembly with Assad and a few of her previous feedback about Russia.
“We want to know what the purpose was and what the direction for that was. As a member of Congress, we want to get a chance to talk about past comments that she’s made and get them into full context,” Lankford stated.
