Studying Time: 3 minutes
For many of her profession, Natasha Lyonne has been considered certainly one of Hollywood’s most universally likable stars — her quirky charms enabling her to steal scenes in each offbeat indie initiatives and big-budget mainstream fare.
However that started to vary final month, when Lyonne introduced her directorial debut, Uncanny Valley, a movie that she says will rely closely on using synthetic intelligence.
The Hollywood veteran insisted that the movie will solely use “ethical” AI skilled solely on non-proprietary knowledge.
Nonetheless, the challenge continues to draw backlash, which Natasha in all probability ought to’ve anticipated, given the slew of respectable considerations about this new know-how.
Lyonne continues to be defending her choice, claiming that the criticism is overblown and audiences will higher perceive her intentions as soon as they’ve seen the movie.
However as is so typically the case with PR disasters, the preliminary misstep has set off a series response.
Now, like Katy Perry earlier than her, Natasha is working harm management and seemingly making the state of affairs worse with every new effort at regaining the general public’s goodwill.
Natasha Lyonne claims David Lynch accredited of AI use by filmmakers
In a brand new interview with Vulture, Lyonne reveals that she lived subsequent door to legendary director David Lynch for a number of years.
Lynch handed away earlier this 12 months, and Lyonne says he stamped generative AI together with his seal of approval in certainly one of their remaining conversations.
“Natasha, this is a pencil,” Lyonne quotes Lynch as saying. “Everybody has entry to a pencil, and likewise, everybody with a cellphone might be utilizing AI, in the event that they aren’t already.
“It’s how you use the pencil. You see?” the enduring filmmaker allegedly concluded.
Lyonne’s remarks about Lynch had been met with allegations of poor style and calculated manipulation of the discourse surrounding AI.
Many known as the veracity of the anecdote into query, noting that Lynch had lengthy been skeptical concerning the influence of superior applied sciences on the filmmaking course of.
AI criticism snowballs into broader ‘is Natasha Lyonne annoying?’ debate
Once more, Natasha’s present PR disaster is following a sample we’ve seen many occasions earlier than, by which one particular misstep serves because the catalyst to a extra common dialog a few superstar’s profession, persona, and “whole deal.”
On this case, many have taken the AI debate as a possibility to share long-simmering resentments about Natasha’s schtick on the whole — and her voice particularly.
“Natasha Lyonne should already be cancelled for doing that obviously fake voice all the time,” wrote one consumer.
“Natasha Lyonne sort of lost me when she started doing the exaggerated Peter Falk impression 24/7 but this, though not unbelievable, is tacky as hell,” one other added (“this” being the declare about Lynch).
“I’m wondering why Natasha Lyonne sounds like a print journalist from the 1940s. She didn’t sound like that in American Pie,” a 3rd chimed in.
We at The Hollywood Gossip stay firmly on Workforce Natasha, and we’re positive she’ll overcome this current tough patch in her profession.
However she would possibly need to rethink that complete AI film factor — that feels like a catastrophe ready to occur.
