The Allahabad Excessive Court docket on June 18 stated {that a} NEET aspirant who had alleged in her petition that the NTA did not declare her end result and that her OMR reply sheet was discovered torn had submitted cast paperwork and the NTA can take authorized motion within the matter.
This got here after the Nationwide Testing Company, on the route of the excessive courtroom’s Lucknow Bench, produced earlier than it the unique OMR reply sheet of the scholar which was discovered to be intact.
Additionally Learn | Rahul Gandhi guarantees to take the voice of the youth from the streets to Parliament
The coed, Ayushi Patel, in her petition, claimed that NTA despatched her a communication saying her end result wouldn’t be declared as her OMR sheet was discovered torn. She had additionally posted a video on social media repeating the allegations that brought about a stir amid the continuing row over claims of irregularities within the conduct of the undergraduate medical entrance examination NEET.
The petitioner had demanded that her OMR sheet be evaluated manually. She had additionally known as for an inquiry towards NTA and demanded that the counselling for admission be stopped.
A Trip Bench of Justice Rajesh Singh had on June 12 requested the NTA to provide the unique information of the scholar.
In compliance with the order, NTA’s Deputy Director Sandeep Sharma offered the unique paperwork of the scholar together with an affidavit.
After seeing the paperwork, the courtroom discovered that the scholar had filed the petition on the premise of cast paperwork. The courtroom termed it regrettable and stated that the NTA is free to take authorized motion within the matter.
On the identical time, the advocate of the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition, which the courtroom accepted.
Additionally Learn | An entrance check gone bitter: NEET
The NTA instructed the courtroom that the choice to take authorized motion towards the petitioner pupil had already been taken by the NTA.
The courtroom stated that the petitioner has submitted cast paperwork, and in such a state of affairs this courtroom can not cease NTA from taking authorized motion towards the scholar.
Reacting to Ms. Patel’s video, which was shared by Congress chief Priyanka Gandhi amongst others, the NTA had on June 12 stated her paper continues to be intact and it’s a case of forgery on the a part of the candidate whose precise rating is decrease than claimed.
“No torn OMR answer sheet was sent from any official NTA email, and the actual OMR is available and not torn. Moreover, all results are available online,” stated an official.
The NTA had countered the claims of incorrect end result on social media stating, “Regarding the viral video featuring Ms XXX, claiming discrepancies in NEET (UG) 2024 scoring and receiving of torn OMR answer sheet, NTA clarifies that no torn answer sheet was sent via an official NTA ID. OMR answer sheet is intact and scores are accurate as per official records…”
