Republican Jefferson Griffin narrowly misplaced his race for a seat on the state Supreme Court docket. Now he’s asking that 60,000 ballots be thrown out primarily based on a principle that an election denier stated amounted to “voter suppression.”
By Doug Bock Clark for ProPublica
Months earlier than voters went to the polls in November, a gaggle of election skeptics primarily based in North Carolina gathered on a name and mentioned what actions to take in the event that they doubted any of the outcomes.
One of many concepts they floated: attempt to get the courts or state election board to throw out tons of of 1000’s of ballots solid by voters whose registrations are lacking a driver’s license quantity and the final 4 digits of a Social Safety quantity.
However that concept was resisted by two activists on the decision, together with the chief of the North Carolina chapter of the Election Integrity Community. The information was lacking not as a result of voters had performed one thing flawed however largely on account of an administrative error by the state. The chief stated the concept was “voter suppression” and “100%” sure to fail within the courts, in keeping with a recording of the July name obtained by ProPublica.
This novel principle is now on the heart of a authorized problem by North Carolina appeals court docket Decide Jefferson Griffin, a Republican who misplaced a race for a state Supreme Court docket seat to the Democratic incumbent, Allison Riggs, by simply 734 votes and is searching for to have the consequence overturned.
The state election board dismissed a earlier model of the problem, which is now being thought-about in federal court docket. Earlier than the election, a Trump-appointed decide denied an try by the Republican Nationwide Committee to take away 225,000 voters from the rolls primarily based on the identical principle.
The newest case is getting consideration statewide and throughout the nation. However it has not but been reported that members of the group that had helped publicize the concept had solid doubt on its legality.
“I don’t comment on pending litigation,” Griffin wrote to ProPublica in response to an in depth listing of questions. “It would be a violation of our code of judicial conduct.”
Embry Owen, Riggs’ marketing campaign supervisor, disputed the problem and referred to as on Griffin to concede. “It’s not appropriate for this election to be decided in court, period. NC voters have already made the decision to send Justice Riggs back to the Supreme Court,” she stated.
The idea Griffin is citing originated with a right-wing activist, Carol Snow, who described herself to ProPublica in an e-mail as “a Bona Fide Grade-A Election Denier.” Snow promoted it with the assistance of the state chapter of the Election Integrity Community, a nationwide group whose chief labored with President Donald Trump in his failed effort to overturn the 2020 election. The community additionally was behind intensive efforts to arrange to contest a Trump loss this 12 months in different states, as ProPublica has reported, in addition to in North Carolina, in keeping with beforehand unreported recordings and transcripts of conferences of the state chapter.
State election officers have discovered that lacking data on a voter’s registration is just not disqualifying as a result of there are quite a few legitimate causes for the state’s database to lack that these particulars.
These causes embrace voters registering earlier than state paperwork was up to date a couple of 12 months in the past to require that data or utilizing alternate authorised paperwork, similar to a utility invoice, to confirm their identities. What’s extra, voters should nonetheless show their identification when casting a poll — most frequently with a driver’s license. “There is virtually no chance of voter fraud resulting from a voter not providing her driver’s license or social security number on her voter registration,” attorneys for the state election board wrote in response to the RNC lawsuit.
Bob Orr, a former GOP state Supreme Court docket justice who left the Republican Get together in 2021, stated he too doubts the speculation. “I appreciate fighting for every vote: If you honestly think illegal votes have been cast, it’s legitimate to try to prove that,” he stated. “But the bottom line is: Did anyone vote illegally? Have you been able to prove one person voted illegally? At this point, no. And we’re weeks past the election and multiple recounts, and there’s no evidence of that.”
In fashionable historical past, the state board’s resolution on who wins elections has been closing, stated Chris Cooper, a professor specializing in North Carolina politics at Western Carolina College. That features a good tighter race in 2020, when a Democratic justice conceded to a Republican after protesting her 401-vote loss to the board.
“We’re used to close elections, we’re used to protests, we’re used to candidates pushing every legal action up to the point the state election board rules,” Cooper stated. However, he added, there is a crucial distinction with Griffin’s petition, which works past the state election board to the courts.
“This is basically saying the state elections system is wrong, and we’re going to court to try to change the rules of the game after the game has been played — which is unprecedented.”
In July 2024, the North Carolina chapter of the Election Integrity Community convened on-line to plan its efforts forward of the presidential election. Frightened a couple of surge of voter registrations from nonwhite voters who they believed would again Democrats, the activists mentioned tips on how to assemble a “suspicious voters list” of individuals whose ballots they might problem.
Then, one of many group’s board members, Jay DeLancy, stated he had one other concept “that’s a lot slicker.”
DeLancy stated that if a candidate misplaced an in depth election, the loss might be overturned by questioning the validity of voters whose registrations are lacking their driver’s license and Social Safety data. “Those are illegal votes,” he claimed. “I would file a protest.”
Jim Womack, the chief of the chapter, instantly pushed again: “That’s a records keeping problem on the part of the state board. That’s not illegal.”
Later within the name Womack stated, “I’m 100% sure you’re not going to get a successful prosecution.” And he informed the group, “That’s considered to be voter suppression, and there’s no way a court is going to find that way.”
However DeLancy requested for backup from the originator of that principle: Carol Snow. She argued that her principle might in actual fact overturn the result of an election.
“I guess we’re gonna find that out,” Snow stated.
Snow is a frontrunner of the conservative activist group North Carolina Audit Drive and lives within the state’s rural mountains. After Trump’s loss in 2020, she threw herself into questioning the election’s outcomes. In 2022, she accompanied a pair of far-right activists to a North Carolina election workplace the place the 2 males unsuccessfully tried to forcefully entry voting machines, and he or she participated in a failed stress marketing campaign to oust the election director who resisted them, ProPublica beforehand reported.
She additionally started submitting overwhelming numbers of information requests and complaints to state election officers, an effort that Womack praised on the July name: “I think Carol has shown a way of really harassing — not that we want to do it for harassment purposes — but really needling the Board of Elections to do their jobs by just constantly deluging them.”
Since late 2021, the state elections board had spent way more time on her requests and complaints than these of every other particular person, spokesperson Patrick Gannon stated in an announcement. “Ms. Snow’s constant barrage of requests and complaints causes other priorities and responsibilities to suffer,” Gannon stated.
Snow described her work to ProPublica as “simply taking the time to learn about my state’s electoral process” and performing for the general public good. “The records I’ve requested are owned by the public. In other words, I’m asking for what belongs to me,” Snow wrote to ProPublica. “If government agencies are understaffed and unable to comply with this state’s Public Records law, they should address the issue with the entities that fund them.”
Within the fall of 2023, Snow filed a criticism alleging that North Carolina’s voter registration type didn’t clearly require voters to supply their driver’s license quantity and the final 4 digits of their Social Safety quantity, as required by federal regulation — as an alternative that data was coded as elective. Snow later described the lacking data as a “line of attack” by means of which unhealthy actors might solid fraudulent votes utilizing faux identities. (A right-wing conspiracy principle holds that this was how Biden gained the 2020 election.)
However she was not in a position to reveal that the lacking data had led to anybody improperly voting. After acquiring public information for tons of of 1000’s of voter registrations, Snow supplied the state board with solely seven examples of what she referred to as potential double voting. The state board discovered all seven to be innocuous issues like knowledge entry errors.
The state board rapidly up to date the shape to require the knowledge. However from late 2023 by means of the autumn of 2024, six complaints, a few of which had been partly primarily based on Snow’s principle, had been filed with the state election board. Apart from the updates to the shape, the state board dismissed the complaints.
By the point of the July name, a few of Snow’s friends appeared dismissive as nicely.
“I’m not suggesting that we can’t arm a candidate that loses a short, a close race with the information they need to file a protest using this,” Womack stated on the decision. “But I would just suggest to you that that’s not the way to win on this thing.”
But the knowledge did find yourself within the Republican Nationwide Committee’s lawsuit making an attempt to disqualify 225,000 voters, a problem DeLancy filed towards Riggs’ victory in North Carolina’s most populous county, and, the day after that was dismissed, Griffin’s problem to over 60,000 voters.
DeLancy wrote to ProPublica that he filed the problem on his personal and didn’t coordinate with Griffin. He additionally stated he disagreed with Womack’s description of such challenges as “voter suppression.” As a substitute, he stated, he noticed it as “a proper response” to the state election board’s “violation of federal law.” “Carol Snow deserves an Order of the Long Leaf Pine for exposing this treasonous behavior on the part of the election officials,” he wrote, referring to an award bestowed by North Carolina’s governor.
Womack wrote to ProPublica that the group he leads “is a non-partisan, neutral organization” that does “not favor one party over another.”
He additionally stated that recordings of the group’s calls are “prohibited and violate our internal policies” and “whatever bootleg recording you may have is unauthorized and may well be altered.” ProPublica has seen a video recording of the decision and verified parts of it with some individuals.
Although Griffin’s problem of Riggs’ victory is now being thought-about in federal court docket, authorized specialists say it might nonetheless find yourself again the place he supposed: in entrance of the state Supreme Court docket.
Griffin’s petition is making what specialists describe as excessive asks to the Supreme Court docket: to permit him to bypass the decrease courts, to permit ballots to be thrown out with out proving that voters did something knowingly flawed and to basically determine whether or not to alter its composition to 6 Republicans and one Democrat.
“Even if they do their best to be open-minded and independent, the facts of the potential conflicts of interest are just too obvious to the public,” stated Orr, the previous Republican justice.
Griffin has described Republican Supreme Court docket Chief Justice Paul Newby as a “good friend and mentor,” and Newby promoted Griffin’s 2020 run for the court docket of appeals. What’s extra, a ProPublica assessment of marketing campaign finance experiences present that the spouses of three justices, together with Newby’s spouse, donated over $12,000 to Griffin’s most up-to-date or earlier campaigns. (The husband of the Supreme Court docket’s different Democratic justice donated to Riggs.)
Newby and different justices didn’t reply to an in depth listing of questions despatched to spokespeople for the Supreme Court docket.
When asserting his candidacy for the Supreme Court docket, Griffin declared, “We are a team that knows how to win — the same team that helped elect Chief Justice Paul Newby and three other members of the current Republican majority.”
Associated story: Republicans try to steal a seat on swing state’s prime court docket
