In February, executives from OpenAI visited Los Angeles, hoping to strike offers with main Hollywood studios. They left empty handed. The studios declined partnerships to make use of Sora, the corporate’s AI–powered video era instrument, Bloomberg reported, citing considerations over how OpenAI would use their information and potential backlash from unions anxious about job losses following the 2023 Hollywood strikes.
OpenAI’s failure to win over Hollywood exposes a deeper subject for the corporate: It appears unwilling to show it may work throughout the contracts, licensing agreements, and labor protections which have ruled the leisure enterprise for greater than a century. OpenAI isn’t simply alienating the $100 billion-plus leisure enterprise—it’s lacking a chance to point out different industries that it’s able to constructing viable, long-term partnerships.
OpenAI’s Hollywood misadventure is harking back to an earlier dispute between the media business and Silicon Valley. Within the early 2000s, Napster appeared poised to upend the music business by providing customers an unprecedented digital catalog of songs. The service turned a cultural phenomenon, nevertheless it was predicated on distributing unlicensed (stolen) music, and the corporate’s refusal to have interaction with copyright regulation proved pricey in the long term. Main labels sued, and by the point Napster realized it was higher off negotiating licensing offers, it was too late. The music business had moved on, choosing sustainable agreements with providers equivalent to Rhapsody, iTunes, and finally Spotify. OpenAI’s know-how is much extra transformative than Napster’s, however its story may look the identical.
Like Napster, OpenAI fails to see that working with established industries is the higher path to long-term development. As a substitute of partaking with creators, OpenAI has scraped information articles, ingested complete libraries of books with out securing rights, and launched a voice assistant that sounded lots like Scarlett Johansson (who had beforehand denied permission). Amid criticism across the Johansson case, OpenAI claimed the voice belonged to a special unnamed actress and carried on. That technique—transfer quick, ask for permission later—might have labored to this point to make OpenAI the dominant participant in generative AI, nevertheless it’s not sustainable.
Studio-friendly AI
As Napster did, OpenAI is opening the door for the movie business to associate with AI corporations that respect its mental property. Lionsgate introduced a partnership with Runway to construct a proprietary AI mannequin skilled completely on the studio’s catalog. The ensuing mannequin might be absolutely clear and managed—Lionsgate is aware of precisely what IP is getting used and may distribute income internally or reinvest it. Equally, James Cameron has teamed with StabilityAI to convey AI to particular results, and veteran movie government Peter Chernin joined with Andreessen Horowitz to launch an AI-native studio, Promise.
These ventures differ from OpenAI in that they’re both coaching fashions completely on licensed information, utilizing AI in slim, artist-controlled pipelines or constructing new studios with Hollywood’s direct involvement. By insisting on management and never acknowledging filmmakers’ considerations, OpenAI might finally discover itself on the surface trying in.
OpenAI ought to study from different tech corporations that after noticed regulation as an impediment however later realized the advantages of cooperation—usually after bruising fights with regulators. For instance, Uber touted itself as a “disruptor,” but it will definitely labored with metropolis governments together with London and Washington, D.C. to safe municipal contracts and bolster market belief.
OpenAI nonetheless has time to persuade legacy industries that it may respect mental property rights, information privateness, and labor guidelines.
As a primary step, OpenAI ought to provide extra transparency round its AI coaching information, serving to studios and unions perceive what copyrighted materials is getting used. A content material provenance system that traces AI-generated outputs like scripts or performances wouldn’t require the mannequin to be absolutely disclosed. OpenAI, studios, and creators may depend on third-party audits to certify that the fashions have been developed with agreed-upon information restrictions and requirements. This may be achieved whereas nonetheless defending proprietary info.
OpenAI also needs to comply with share income with rights holders indirectly. A Spotify-style royalty system might not be replicable for movie, however the core concept of a artistic fund continues to be viable—particularly in managed circumstances like Runway’s take care of Lionsgate. The thought isn’t to pay per use, however to license pre-approved datasets and share income tied to the movies derived from that content material.
OpenAI in Hollywood
There’s an actual alternative in bundling information: OpenAI may undertake the same mannequin utilizing licensed bundles of copyrighted content material, developed in partnership with unions and particular person studios. Even a restricted system would exhibit a willingness to collaborate. The best danger for OpenAI isn’t in getting the main points incorrect—it’s in doing nothing whereas rivals transfer forward.
On this vein, it’s in OpenAI’s finest curiosity to have interaction extra broadly with Hollywood—not simply studios, however labor and creators. The 2023 strikes confirmed that unions form public narratives and coverage, and any long-term technique should replicate that. Funneling a portion of AI-driven income to business professionals would sign an intent to work with, not round, human expertise. This sort of initiative may reframe AI as a artistic associate, not a risk, and assist OpenAI stand aside from opaque general-purpose fashions.
Final month, greater than 400 Hollywood creatives despatched a letter to the White Home, arguing that AI corporations ought to observe copyright regulation like some other business: “There is no reason to weaken or eliminate the copyright protections that have helped America flourish,” the letter stated. The longer OpenAI waits to behave, the extra it opens the door for others to take action first.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t essentially replicate the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
This story was initially featured on Fortune.com
