Prince Harry, lengthy recognized for being an outspoken advocate on (particularly males’s) psychological well being points, is at the moment centered on a really difficult drawback: that of social media and its results on youth.
“In many cases, the smartphone is stealing young people’s childhood,” he stated in a dialog, a video of which was completely shared with Fortune this week, with social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, creator of The Anxious Technology.
Haidt—whose 4 foundational smartphone guidelines have impressed each celebration and pushback—couldn’t agree extra, explaining to Harry the premise of his guide: That folks born after 1995 (Gen Z, roughly) all through the English-speaking world hit puberty with excessive charges of nervousness, melancholy, self-harm, and suicide, which all rose sharply between 2010 and 2012. And that it was no coincidence—however as an alternative a direct results of the smartphone.
“Young people trade in their flip phones for smartphones,” Haidt stated about that second of generational shifting, “and now with a front-facing camera, high-speed internet, a million apps that are competing with each other to hook kids’ attention. So, the ‘anxious generation’ is helping us understand the incredible destructive force of this transformation of childhood … and what we can do now to stop that from happening and to help those who already have been through it.”
Haidt and the Duke of Sussex sat down for the intimate dialogue (see the total video, beneath) about social media and psychological well being as a part of Harry’s Archewell Basis 2024 Perception Periods—public conversations, highlights of which seem in a brand new Perception Report—in regards to the impression of expertise, with the voices of youth entrance and middle.
Right here, among the strongest takeaways from the spirited dialog.
Dad and mom vs. social media firms
Considered one of Haidt’s greatest worries in regards to the present state of parenting and social media is that, “We are overprotecting our children in the real world and under-protecting them online,” he stated. “And both of those moves are mistakes. They’re bad for development.” It’s why he advocates for no smartphones earlier than highschool, no social media earlier than 16, phone-free faculties, and extra unsupervised play and childhood independence.
It’s additionally why, Harry stated, “It’s very easy for social media companies to point the finger at parents and say, ‘Well, you know, this is down to you. This is down to your parenting.’”
However that’s an argument that Haidt rejects.
“If there were some parents who were getting this wrong and most parents were getting it right, then I’d be very receptive to that argument,” he stated. “But once kids get a phone and social media, the rest of family life turns into a fight over screen time. And this is happening everywhere. This is happening in Silicon Valley, where the parents know what’s going on.”
So why will we give our 10 yr olds a smartphone? “The main reason,” Haidt stated, “is because everyone else did. We don’t want our daughter to be the only one who’s left out. I’m facing this now with my 14-year-old daughter on Snapchat. So the tech companies put us in a bind, and then they’re trying to blame us for what they did.” It’s why he’s additionally an advocate of collective motion, or dad and mom banding collectively to comply with delay the acquisition of smartphones for his or her youngsters.
What about smartphones for security?
By means of his Perception Periods, stated Harry, he’s spoken with dad and mom who say they offer their youngsters telephones at a youthful age to maintain them protected.
“It’s a double edged sword,” he stated. “They want them to have their phone at school in case of emergency, but once, like any kid, you have your phone, even if you’re told you’re not allowed to download that app, kids have a way of working around it.”
Haidt’s not shopping for the protection argument, although. “If you want to give your kid a phone, so if anything goes wrong they can call you, great. Give them a phone. Just don’t give them a supercomputer connected to everyone in the world… They don’t need that. The millennials had flip phones. They went through puberty with flip phones to call each other, text each other, meet up. It came out fine.”
Gen Z, however, “went through puberty with a supercomputer blocking out almost everything else in life,” he stated. “Everything goes down: Much less time with friends, much less sunlight, very many fewer books, many fewer hobbies. You take almost everything out of childhood. You replace it with this and a bunch of million short videos. It’s not much of a childhood.”
The ‘myth’ of social media as lifeline
Prince Harry then raised the thought of social media having a constructive—and even life-saving—facet.
“Social media, we know, to a large extent, is giving an outlet, an added resource, to kids that perhaps don’t feel comfortable coming to us to talk about their issues and their troubles and their worries,” he stated. “Kids online will be feeling more connected with complete strangers on social media. So how do you, if you’re a parent, know that your kid is getting good out of social media?”
Haidt stated it’s “one of Meta’s favorite talking points” that “social media is a lifeline for LGBTQ kids, for kids from marginalized communities. And that’s just not true.”
What’s true, he stated, “is that the internet was great for them. The internet solved all these problems in the ’90s. If you’re a gay kid, you’re not out to anyone in a rural part of America or England, the internet was amazing. You could find information, you could find people like you, and you could communicate.” However social media, Haidt insisted, has modified all that.
“It’s no longer even about just me connecting to you,” he stated. “It’s now about an algorithm-driven information feed that sends content material to you. This isn’t what they want. When you have any particular curiosity, yow will discover that with Google. You don’t want an algorithm to feed you stuff.
So it’s “a myth,” he stated, that Instagram and TikTok are lifelines. “The research, I think, is very clear: When kids have a best friend or especially a small group [of friends], they generally do well. When kids don’t have a close friend or close group, they’re much less likely to do well. When you have 300 connections, you don’t have time for anyone.”
Extra on psychological well being:
