Join The Transient, The Texas Tribune’s every day e-newsletter that retains readers in control on essentially the most important Texas information.
Shortly after leaving his place as Housing and City Growth Secretary with the Trump administration, Ben Carson started engaged on a supplemental curriculum for elementary college college students he referred to as Little Patriots. When this system launched publicly in 2021, he mentioned it was meant to compensate for a scarcity of emphasis on “the good things of our nation.”
The preliminary curriculum, comprising quick movies and quizzes, contained important inaccuracies and an undue emphasis on Christianity in U.S. historical past, together with the inaccurate assertion that each one founding fathers have been Christians, in line with an American Historic Affiliation historian who reviewed the supplies on the request of a reporter on the time.
When requested a few collection of errors, comparable to the wrong date for the Battle of Bull Run, Little Patriots’s builders made some corrections. Nonetheless, they staunchly defended the curriculum’s Christian emphasis, saying in a press release “we intention to ship a program that permits our nation’s youngsters to find out about Religion, Liberty, Group and Life and the position these pillars performed all through our nation’s historical past.”
Three years later, Carson is now a part of a panel tasked with reviewing a brand new, state-authored kindergarten by means of highschool curriculum in Texas. Since an early model of the curriculum was launched a couple of months in the past, it has been closely criticized for what many name an outsized emphasis on Christianity. The curriculum and suggestions on it might be reviewed on the Texas State Board of Schooling’s web site.
Carson is one in every of 10 individuals picked by Texas Schooling Commissioner Mike Morath for the Open Schooling Sources Advisory Board to make sure the supplies are correct, age-appropriate and free from bias. Whereas some panelists are skilled educators, others usually are not and no less than half of them, comparable to Carson, have a historical past of religion primarily based advocacy.
The advisory panel’s composition raises questions on how the Texas Schooling Company (TEA) chosen its members and whether or not they have been predisposed to green-light a Bible-infused curriculum that aligned with their beliefs. The occasion is simply the newest controversy for an company that has an extended and shaky historical past with the separation of church and state in its curriculum and textbooks.
The state curriculum, tentatively dubbed Bluebonnet Studying, will likely be elective for varsity districts to undertake however closely incentivized with additional funding, sparking important curiosity and concern concerning the position it would play in shaping the way forward for the state’s schooling system.
“Instead of looking for help primarily from nonpolitical educators and researchers working in our state’s world-class universities, the commissioner is farming out the education of Texas kids to people who favor political agendas over teaching our kids the truth,” mentioned Val Benavidez, president of the Texas Freedom Community, an advocacy group that focuses on the separation of church and state and spiritual freedom.
A very powerful Texas information,
despatched weekday mornings.
The TEA wouldn’t launch paperwork associated to the advisory board’s recommendation by means of an open information request. As a substitute, the company requested the lawyer common whether or not such paperwork might be withheld, arguing that it “and the Open Education Resource Advisory Board share a privity of interest in the matters at issue.”
Texas shapes its curriculum
The panel on which Carson was chosen to serve was created by Home Invoice 1605, the one regulation handed final 12 months aimed toward addressing Texas’ important instructor scarcity.
State-provided assets proved useful for educators in the course of the pandemic, main some educators and lawmakers to name for the creation of a extra refined product that may be obtainable for lecturers of all grades.
There could be a number of advantages for supporters of the laws, which referred to as for the creation of a complete Ok-12 curriculum that colleges throughout Texas may undertake without charge. It could assist preserve lecturers from spending numerous hours making ready their very own lesson plans, they mentioned, and the brand new curriculum would align with the state’s standardized take a look at. One other objective is to align instructing with essentially the most up-to-date cognitive science on how college students study to learn.
Districts are nonetheless free to decide on the curriculum their lecturers use, however are incentivized to undertake the state-authored supplies, and different curricula deemed by the state as “high quality instructional materials,” with $40 per pupil per 12 months and an extra $20 per pupil per 12 months that can be utilized for printing prices. The additional $60 per pupil will solely apply to the state supplies if the state schooling board approves them in November.
The incentives come as districts face lagging state funding, declining enrollment and corresponding finances deficits. Many district leaders have already mentioned they do not plan to undertake the state-developed supplies, if handed, with some citing the standard of current supplies, and others involved concerning the spiritual content material and associated parental pushback.
The Northside Unbiased Faculty District, for instance, one of many largest within the state, will proceed to make use of its personal, district-created curriculum “because it allows us, as a district, to better meet the needs of our students and to more effectively align our K-12 instruction vertically,” district spokesperson Barry Perez mentioned.
Others like Michael Lee, superintendent of Booker Unbiased Faculty District within the Texas Panhandle will likely be taking a more in-depth look.
“We will certainly look at the curriculum,” Lee beforehand advised the Texas Tribune. “We will look at any area to find a dollar.”
HB 1605 additionally referred to as for the creation of a 10-member advisory board to vet the state-authored curriculum.
Particularly, the regulation requires the board to make sure the supplies are:
- Of the best high quality.
- Aligned with state requirements adopted by the state schooling board.
- Appropriate for the age of scholars on the grade degree for which the supplies are developed.
- Free from bias and factual errors.
- In compliance with state regulation concerning required and prohibited curriculum.
Suggestions from the advisory board was used to “advise the agency on the development of the materials,” in line with the TEA, and their suggestions was not shared with the state schooling board, which is able to make the ultimate resolution on the curriculum. The advisory board didn’t collectively focus on the curriculum, and TEA was not required to alter the curriculum on account of any members advice.
By means of a separate course of, a whole bunch of state-approved lecturers and different curriculum specialists have been charged by the state schooling board with analyzing the identical instructing supplies because the advisory board, guaranteeing they met state requirements and sure bodily and digital specs, in addition to hunting down disproven strategies of instructing college students how you can learn.
The critiques will likely be thought-about together with public feedback because the state schooling board decides whether or not to approve, reject or request edits to the state curriculum earlier than it’s made obtainable for districts to undertake.
With greater than 30,000 pages of supplies, together with lesson plans, letters for folks and precise workbooks, every advisory board member was allowed to decide on which supplies to assessment, in line with the TEA.
In contrast to the lecturers and curriculum specialists tapped by the state schooling board, nonetheless, notable advisory board members have tangential and largely partisan connections to schooling and curriculum.
In a press release, the TEA mentioned board members have been chosen “based off experience and expertise.”
The company didn’t reply to questions on why panelists with spiritual backgrounds have been chosen to vet a statewide curriculum on studying and language arts.
‘Outsized play to Christianity?’
Earlier than launching the Little Patriots program, which organizers say has grown for use by greater than 200,000 college students nationwide, Carson was an ex-officio member of the 1776 Fee, a extremely criticized initiative of former president Donald Trump’s, tasked with elevating a “patriotic education” on the native degree for all colleges. The fee stopped in need of calling for a nationwide curriculum.
Echoing the criticism of the advisory board in Texas, the American Historic Affiliation criticized the 1776 Fee for a famous lack of U.S. historical past specialists.
The ultimate report revealed by the fee within the waning days of the Trump administration referred to as for a return to instructing “faith-based virtues” because the bedrock for the founding of the nation and the inspiration for the Declaration of Independence.
One other Texas advisory board member, Thomas Lindsay, the upper schooling coverage director for the conservative Texas Public Coverage Basis, was additionally a member of the 1776 Fee.
Influential in shaping the state’s conservative coverage agenda,TPPF has a historical past of advocating for extra Christianity in colleges, together with by means of setting apart time for prayer or Bible studying in colleges and requiring a framed copy of the Ten Commandments to be in every classroom.
In a 2023 article, the group referred to as for a “revival of faith now more than ever,” including, “there is not a revival more needed than among our youth.”
In current interviews, Lindsay and Carson pushed again on the concept the supplies they reviewed for the Texas curriculum over-emphasized Christianity in an inappropriate manner.
Carson mentioned in a current interview that references to religion, irrespective of how related, are going to be criticized by the general public.
“Our Judeo-Christian foundation is a very important part of who we are,” Carson said. “Historically, it differentiated this nation from several other nations throughout the world, and there’s no reason that our young people shouldn’t understand that history.”
Lindsay mentioned studying concerning the Bible is critical to grasp different cultural references and customary turns of phrase.
“Whether you’re an atheist, an agnostic or some different religion, you can’t understand the history of this country, you can’t understand the history of the world, if you don’t understand some sort of knowledge of the Bible,” he mentioned. “That’s what the [Open Education Resource] curriculum is trying to do.”
He pointed to phrases like “writing on the wall,” a reference to the E-book of Daniel and “by the pores and skin of your enamel,” a phrase utilized in Job 19:20.
Past that, he mentioned the brand new supplies are greater high quality and extra complete than those who college districts have used lately, citing a TEA research that discovered solely 19% of classroom work throughout the state is definitely thought-about “on grade-level.”
In an essay rebutting critics, Lindsay additionally cited success seen at early pilots of the eventual state-authored curriculum on the Lubbock and Temple college districts.
Different advisory board members embody Marvin McNeese, who oversees the overall schooling program on the School of Biblical Research in Houston and Andrea Ramírez, who served because the director of the Heart for Religion and Alternative Initiatives on the U.S. Division of Schooling in the course of the Trump administration.
McNeese mentioned in an interview that he has grappled with contextualizing biblical references with out proselytizing whereas making ready coursework for the overall schooling programs at his faculty, which is accredited by each spiritual and non-religious entities.
“It is my job as we prep our courses to make sure that … if we are including any Bible, it is just … a presentation of the information,” he mentioned. “It is not proselytizing, it’s not creating an act of worship, at least not within our classes.”
McNeese mentioned the five hundred pages of state-authored curriculum supplies he reviewed, “stayed on the precise aspect of that line.”
Different board members, together with Ramírez, pushed again on the concept they have been chosen to rubber-stamp a faith-heavy assortment of supplies, including that spiritual references are just one a part of the broad curriculum.
“I do not … think the [Open Education Resource] curriculum materials give outsized play to Christianity or any faith,” she mentioned. “It is with great relevance to understand that the mention of religious traditions, regardless of the faith, make up a small portion of the product when contextually relevant.”
Like different board members, Ramírez has a deep historical past of commingling schooling and Christianity. For 2 years, she hosted a weekly tv program centered on the “nexus of faith and education,” and in opinion columns for a number of Christian publications, she referred to as for the standard of schooling to be addressed throughout the nation.
“When God’s word is applied to our view of education and educational issues, we often come to a realization that education equality, for example, access to quality education, is an issue that needs the Body of Christ’s attention,” she wrote.
Former Democratic Sen. Eddie Lucio, who was outspoken about his Christian religion and pro-life stances throughout his time within the Texas Legislature, was additionally tapped for the board. However the lawmaker did not assessment any supplies, citing private household well being points. He declined to touch upon the method.
Board member pushed for cultural relevance
Different panelists embody Eliza Paul, a transportation engineer married to state Rep. Dennis Paul, R-Houston; former Texas Supreme Courtroom Justice Eva Guzman; College of Texas at Austin Professor Sharon Vaughn; actor and creator Danica McKellar; and former SBOE chair and Texas Historic Fee board member Donna Bahorich.
Bahorich noticed firsthand the controversy related to spiritual supplies in public college curricula in 2018 when she abstained from a vote on whether or not references to Moses ought to stay in social research curricula.
As she reviewed the supplies this 12 months, she was aware of the response spiritual supplies may garner.
“I wanted to make sure that the biblical material focused on cultural relevance and to be sure that it stays in that vein,” she mentioned. “Because biblical references are going to raise controversy, right? … Because it hadn’t been something that was in the current works.”
“It is not a typical thing that you see,” she added.
Advisory board members shared suggestions between December 2023 and March 2024, and didn’t present one complete report.
The preliminary curriculum, written with the recommendation of the advisory board, has already been altered in response to public suggestions and backlash in current weeks and shared with state schooling board members in a letter from the schooling company.
The company made modifications to handle issues by critics, together with rewording some spiritual features, offering extra context in letters despatched residence to folks and eradicating small parts of the supplies. Within the letter, the company additionally pushed again on different claims of an outsized concentrate on Christianity, pointing to the inclusion of different spiritual texts, just like the Hebrew Bible.
Bahorich mentioned that the critiques and ongoing complete course of will lead to a high-quality and totally vetted curriculum.
“I’m a big proponent of what the state is doing here,” she mentioned. “The board is very attentive to the public’s concerns about things, and you know, it’ll be adjusted.”
Broad-based criticism
Within the months for the reason that curriculum was initially revealed for assessment, a wide range of critics have come out in opposition to the supplies, together with spiritual leaders, advocacy organizations and students.
David Brockman, a spiritual research scholar who reviewed the supplies, mentioned in a current report authored for the Texas Freedom Community that he discovered an overemphasis on Christianity within the classes, together with detailed Bible classes “even when they are both unnecessary and unwarranted.”
For instance, a kindergarten unit on the appreciation of artwork consists of a complete artwork lesson on the creation and flood tales from the Bible, referencing in passing that Maya, Aztec and Greeks typically adorned their pottery to “show their religious beliefs of how the world was created.”
“In sharp contrast, it treats the biblical stories in great detail, devoting four pages to them, with accompanying artworks illustrating specific events from these stories,” in line with the report, and “in a subsequent application exercise, students are drilled, not on the artwork, but on the details of the biblical creation story.”
Criticism got here after the state revealed a preliminary model of the supplies for assessment and remark, garnering a mixture of reactions, in line with Shannon Trejo, the deputy commissioner for the Workplace of Faculty Packages on the schooling company.
A number of the complaints included the notion that there have been not sufficient spiritual supplies, for instance, she mentioned. Others included qualms about the best way phonics is taught, using pupil grouping in classes and using read-aloud texts.
Regardless of the extraordinary pushback, spiritual supply materials has solely been supposed to construct background information, Trejo mentioned.
“There are connections between certain religious source material, events, people and happenings in the United States and across the world,” she mentioned. “And if you don’t have the advantage of knowing that background, you don’t get a really good sense of the depth of what happened, or who those people were or what occurred.”
TEA officers and advisory board members who have been interviewed pointed to a proposed lesson that pairs Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter From a Birmingham Jail” with the Biblical story of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, whose defiance of the Babylonian chief Nebuchadnezzar is cited by King for example of civil disobedience.
Whereas the letter has been taught up to now, college students may need misplaced the entire that means as a consequence of hesitance to offer the biblical background, in line with Todd Davis, the affiliate commissioner for tutorial technique for the company.
“What our supplies do is make it possible to grasp what that reference of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego actually is, however it’s not about studying the Bible. It is about studying a deeper understanding of Dr. Martin Luther King’s message,” he mentioned.
What occurs subsequent
Along with the Christian affect, the supplies “whitewash” damaging occasions consequential to the early historical past of America, together with the brutal remedy of Native People and the foundational position performed by slavery, critics say.
“Through the use of mild terms such as ‘share,’ ‘introduce,’ and ‘teach,’ rather than the more accurate ‘attempt to convert,’ the authors misleadingly suggest that conversion efforts were a friendly dialogue between religions and consistently conceal the religious intolerance and often brutal power dynamics at play in these efforts,” Brockman mentioned within the Texas Freedom Community report.
McNeese pushed again that the teachings have been designed to be age-appropriate, including that he “would question whether it’s appropriate to get into such gory detail with those age grades.”
McNeese and Lindsay mentioned dad and mom ought to view the curriculum by itself deserves, whatever the board’s affiliations or different criticism.
Advocates who pushed for the passage of the regulation, together with the nonprofit Texas 2036, which focuses on workforce growth and schooling, hope that the rigorous curriculum on the coronary heart of current controversy received’t be sidelined.
“The conversations which can be occurring are important to making sure that lecturers and college students have entry to the perfect curriculum doable,” Gabe Grantham, a coverage adviser for the group mentioned. “I do hope that goal of getting high-quality materials in the hands of teachers isn’t lost in all of this, though.”
“As with something we speak about with schooling, time is all the time of the essence, as a result of any time we wait, we’re having one other baby transfer by means of the schooling system with out the helps obligatory to achieve their full potential,” he added.
The state schooling board will meet in November to vote on open schooling assets and different curricula.
Disclosure: Texas 2036, Texas Freedom Community and Texas Public Coverage Basis have been monetary supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan information group that’s funded partly by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Monetary supporters play no position within the Tribune’s journalism. Discover a full checklist of them right here.
