Join The Transient, The Texas Tribune’s every day e-newsletter that retains readers on top of things on essentially the most important Texas information.
Texas can proceed with scheduling the execution of loss of life row inmate Robert Roberson regardless of his claims of innocence and requires a brand new trial. However a Texas Home committee, whose members imagine Roberson was convicted primarily based on junk science, nonetheless expects him to offer them with testimony about his conviction and appeals.
Roberson was convicted of capital homicide in 2003 for the loss of life of his 2-year-old daughter, Nikki, who was recognized with shaken child syndrome.
In October, Roberson’s execution was halted on the eleventh hour after the Texas Home Felony Jurisprudence Committee subpoenaed him to testify. That set off a separation of powers battle between the legislative and govt branches, with the Texas Supreme Court docket staying Roberson’s execution to think about which department’s authority trumped whose on this circumstance.
The court docket dominated Nov. 15 {that a} legislative committee’s authority to compel testimony via a subpoena couldn’t be used to override the manager department’s authority to hold out Roberson’s loss of life sentence as scheduled.
That enables the prosecuting district legal professional to now request the scheduling of a brand new execution date. A brand new date can not fall inside 90 days of the request. Anderson County District Legal professional Allyson Mitchell, who sought Roberson’s final execution date, didn’t reply to a message asking if and when she meant to request a brand new execution warrant.
After the Nov. 15 court docket ruling, Gretchen Sween, Roberson’s legal professional, requested the state to chorus from requesting a brand new date.
“The ancillary benefit to Mr. Roberson of staying his execution hopefully gives time for those with power to address a grave wrong to see what is apparent to anyone who gives the medical evidence fair consideration: his daughter Nikki’s death was a tragedy not a crime; Robert is innocent,” Sween mentioned in an announcement.
Roberson’s attorneys have at the very least three months to file any new appeals in his felony case. The courts have denied all of his appeals to this point, most lately on procedural grounds — so it was unclear what remaining authorized recourse he had.
A very powerful Texas information,
despatched weekday mornings.
Gov. Greg Abbott additionally has the authority to grant a one-time 30-day reprieve. However he had declined to take action main as much as Roberson’s scheduled execution in October, and he excoriated Home lawmakers for interfering in Roberson’s sentence.
Although the Texas Supreme Court docket cleared the way in which for Roberson’s execution, it additionally famous that there was now loads of time for the Texas Division of Felony Justice to provide Roberson for testimony in response to the legislative subpoena.
“If the committee still wishes to obtain his testimony, we assume that the department can reasonably accommodate a new subpoena,” Justice Evan A. Younger wrote. “To the extent that an accommodation is not forthcoming, so long as a subpoena issues in a way that does not inevitably block a scheduled execution, nothing in our holding prevents the committee from pursuing judicial relief in the ordinary way to compel a witness’s testimony.”
After the court docket’s choice Nov. 15, State Reps. Joe Moody, D-El Paso, and Jeff Leach, R-Plano, who’ve spearheaded the hassle to win Roberson a brand new trial, mentioned in an announcement that they’d search to comply with via on the committee’s subpoena to acquire Roberson’s testimony.
“The Supreme Court strongly reinforced our belief that our Committee can indeed obtain Mr. Roberson’s testimony and made clear that it expects the Executive Branch of government to accommodate us in doing so,” Moody and Leach mentioned in an announcement. “That has been our position all along, and we look forward to working with the Executive Branch to do just that.”
Roberson had been set to testify in individual on the Capitol on Oct. 21, till Legal professional Basic Ken Paxton’s workplace stepped in and mentioned Roberson might solely seem just about. Roberson’s legal professional and the Texas Home committee objected, arguing that the loss of life row inmate, who has autism, can be ill-equipped to testify successfully over video.
Home lawmakers then deliberate to go to loss of life row to take Roberson’s testimony there, earlier than Paxton’s workplace additionally scuttled that effort, in accordance with a recounting of occasions included within the lawmakers’ court docket submitting.
Paxton’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to a message Nov. 15 asking if it could enable the Texas Division of Felony Justice to provide Roberson for testimony.
The Home committee might problem a brand new subpoena, which it might ask a court docket to implement if it encounters resistance from Paxton’s workplace or TDCJ.
TDCJ didn’t reply to a request for remark Nov. 15.
