California District Choose George H. Wu declined Transfer’s preliminary injunction request towards CoStar on Monday, stating the portal did not show the chance of “imminent, irreparable harm.”
Whether or not it’s refining your online business mannequin, mastering new applied sciences, or discovering methods to capitalize on the following market surge, Inman Join New York will put together you to take daring steps ahead. The Subsequent Chapter is about to start. Be a part of it. Be part of us and hundreds of actual property leaders Jan. 22-24, 2025.
California District Choose George H. Wu has declined Transfer’s request for a preliminary injunction towards rival portal CoStar Group, based on courtroom paperwork filed after a listening to between the portals on Monday.
TAKE THE INMAN INTEL INDEX SURVEY FOR SEPTEMBER
“The Court is not persuaded that Move has demonstrated, with evidence, likely, and imminent, irreparable harm, even if it can demonstrate past misappropriation at least on Kaminsky’s part,” Wu mentioned in a 13-page response. “… Move has not made the ‘clear showing’ that it should be awarded the ‘extraordinary’ and ‘drastic’ remedy of a preliminary injunction. Move’s motion is denied.”
Wu’s ruling is the most recent chapter in a theft of commerce secrets and techniques lawsuit towards CoStar Group and former Realtor.com Information & Insights editor James Kaminsky, who CoStar employed in March to handle a staff that writes itemizing descriptions for high-end condominium and co-op buildings in NYC.
After being laid off from Realtor.com in January, Kaminsky accessed roughly 40 Transfer-owned recordsdata, which included Information & Insights staff wage and bonuses, an ongoing listing of Realtor.com Information & Insights tales, a “2022 or 2023” presentation on viewers and income projections, and two different recordsdata with passwords to third-party subscriptions, WordPress directions, and employees contact numbers.
Transfer claimed these recordsdata included commerce secrets and techniques that Kaminsky shared with CoStar Group to assist the portal bolster its Properties.com site visitors and SEO (search engine optimization) efficiency, and requested the Courtroom grant a preliminary injunction to cease CoStar and Kaminsky’s alleged continued entry to and use of “unauthorized files” as they pursued an expedited discovery.
“Move easily meets the standards for entry of a preliminary injunction and for an order authorizing limited expedited forensic discovery,” Transfer’s preliminary injunction request learn. “With an appropriately crafted Order, the Court can help Move stop further misappropriation of trade secrets, ensure unauthorized access to its computer systems has stopped, prevent more spoliation, and determine where Move’s stolen information has been sent.”
Each portals have offered separate forensic knowledgeable stories earlier than the Courtroom over the previous month.
Transfer’s report, which was carried out by Information Corp VP of World Cyber Protection Howard Pence, revealed Kaminsky transferred entry to 40 paperwork throughout his last two days of working for Realtor.com.
“I am not aware of any legitimate business purpose for a former employee such as Mr. Kaminsky to access Move’s electronic files on the Google Docs account after his employment ended,” he mentioned in an Aug. 28 submitting. “Mr. Kaminsky was not authorized to access the Google Docs account after his employment ended.”
Roughly per week later, CoStar shared the outcomes of its forensic report, which mentioned Kaminsky solely “minimally accessed” the recordsdata in query and by no means shared these recordsdata with anybody at CoStar. “Move cannot identify any change CoStar has made to its business or damage it has suffered as a result of Kaminsky’s access to the five Move documents; and CoStar’s Homes.com outperformed Realtor.com for months prior to Kaminsky joining CoStar,” the submitting learn.
Choose Wu mentioned Transfer’s filings and forensic proof failed to satisfy the necessities for a preliminary injunction, and said they may have in the event that they’d adopted via with the preliminary request for an expedited discovery.
“Lacking evidence of its own (because of a failure to take advantage of an opportunity for discovery, despite its initial request for such an opportunity), Move otherwise only questions the veracity of Kaminsky in multiple regards,” he mentioned within the submitting. “But Move’s failure to take advantage of the opportunity for discovery has allowed it to either a) consider only what it believes it already knows about Kaminsky’s conduct before this lawsuit was filed (none of which involves actual disclosure of anything to CoStar) to form the basis for what Move believes [or] speculates Kaminsky might do with CoStar going forward…”
A Transfer spokesperson mentioned Wu’s ruling hasn’t deterred the portal from pursuing the case, noting “the ruling is just one step in the process” and so they look “forward to the discovery period and having our day in court.”
In the meantime, CoStar Group Common Counsel Gene Boxer mentioned they’re ready to “fight and win this dispute on the merits” as Transfer stays steadfast with their claims.
“In today’s opinion, the Court noted repeatedly that Move had refused to take discovery, even when offered the chance. That is because the truth is anathema to Move’s case,” Boxer mentioned in an emailed assertion to Inman.”Somewhat, Transfer most well-liked to hawk a baseless narrative that CoStar was utilizing Transfer paperwork when there was zero proof to substantiate that declare.”
“As we have said from the beginning, this case — which Move has tried to weaponize in the press — is a PR stunt in response to the fact that Move is failing in the marketplace,” he added. “Homes.com, based on a ‘your listing, your lead’ model, which is both broker and consumer-friendly, is accelerating past Move’s failing Realtor.com. Move’s baseless claim for relief, which fell flat today, cannot change that reality.”
Learn the complete submitting under:
Electronic mail Marian McPherson