This report is obtainable completely to subscribers of Inman Intel, the information and analysis arm of Inman providing deep insights and market intelligence on the enterprise of residential actual property and proptech. Subscribe in the present day.
It’s probably the most contentious U.S. presidential election cycle in current reminiscence — and the brokerage world just isn’t immune from its affect.
As Intel examined final week, actual property brokers have been tiptoeing round uncomfortable political subjects with a few of their shoppers.
However a brand new survey of three,000 U.S. customers in early October reveals the ways in which supporters of the 2 main presidential candidates — Donald Trump and Kamala Harris — typically strategy the homebuying course of by means of distinctive lenses.
The most recent Inman-Dig Insights client survey means that in Harris supporters, brokers are discovering shoppers who’re extra keen to belief brokers and to take a conventional strategy to itemizing their houses on the market. In the meantime, shoppers who’re inclined to help Trump are typically a bit extra reluctant to take an agent’s recommendation, at the same time as they largely nonetheless find yourself on the identical web page.
Intel drills deep this week with breakdowns of energetic homebuyers and sellers, probably near-future consumers, and U.S. customers broadly.
The evaluation sheds gentle on client attitudes on the NAR settlement, fee negotiation practices, and what’s bringing consumers to the market in the present day within the first place.
See how Trump supporters and Harris supporters are approaching the market in a different way in the present day — and the numerous areas they’ve in frequent — within the full report.
Incomes belief on the margins
In Intel’s month-to-month surveys of actual property professionals, brokerage leaders routinely say they assume shoppers have a low opinion of actual property brokers proper now.
However when Intel surveys working-age U.S. adults throughout the nation, they report the precise reverse.
- Clear majorities of each Harris supporters and Trump supporters report having a optimistic opinion of actual property brokers, with fewer than 1 in 10 members of both group reporting they’ve a unfavorable impression of brokers general.
That mentioned, supporters of the Republican presidential ticket had been a bit extra more likely to have an ambivalent and even unfavorable perspective towards brokers than their Democratic counterparts.
They usually’re much less more likely to say their esteem of brokers has improved over the previous 12 months.
- 42 p.c of Harris supporters say their opinion of actual property brokers has improved over the previous 12 months, with solely 7 p.c saying their opinion has worsened.
- By comparability, 36 p.c of Trump supporters say they assume extra extremely of brokers in the present day than they did a 12 months in the past, with 9 p.c saying their opinion has worsened.
This truth touches on a broader theme that emerged throughout a variety of questions on this survey: some Trump supporters are likelier to start out out with decrease belief for brokers and the system through which they function, and will take extra efforts to persuade because of this.
However brokers who put in that additional effort are more likely to break by means of with their shoppers, the survey outcomes recommend.
The artwork of the deal
When requested concerning the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors’ proposed settlement, most Individuals say they nonetheless haven’t heard of it.
However Harris supporters in early October had been extra more likely to say they had been at the very least loosely accustomed to the NAR deal — and extra more likely to consider the deal is sweet for customers.
- 32 p.c of Harris supporters informed the survey that they had been conscious of a current settlement involving NAR. By comparability, 26 p.c of Trump supporters surveyed had been conscious of the settlement.
- 64 p.c of Harris supporters who mentioned that they had heard of the deal had the impression it was good for customers. Almost 59 p.c of Trump supporters who had been accustomed to the deal agreed with that concept.
- Nonetheless, 11 p.c of Trump supporters with data of the NAR deal mentioned it was good for neither customers nor the true property trade. That’s in comparison with solely 5 p.c of Harris supporters who shared the identical skepticism towards the deal.
These outcomes mirror the opinions of the broader inhabitants, lots of whom are usually not trying to transfer any time quickly, or could solely be beginning to take into account a transfer just a few months down the road.
However the customers who had been energetic available on the market — and dealing with brokers — in early October had been way more engaged with the questions at hand.
An altered battlefield
Intel wished to know the way energetic consumers and sellers are navigating the adjustments, and — as a matter of curiosity — how their approaches may be completely different in accordance with their voting intention within the coming election.
Intel discovered proof that when they really hit the market, Harris-supporting shoppers are a bit extra deferential to the previous establishment — on each the customer aspect and the vendor aspect.
And that begins with the fee charges that Harris supporters are agreeing to pay.
Trump supporters available on the market in early October had been extra more likely to report reaching a sub-2 p.c compensation charge with their purchaser’s agent — however no extra more likely to say they achieved that by means of precise charge negotiation.
- 25 p.c of Trump supporters mentioned they signed an settlement with their purchaser’s agent that pledged to pay near 1.5 p.c of the transaction or much less.
- Solely 17 p.c of Harris supporters mentioned their purchaser’s agent settlement had a compensation charge that low.
This was not essentially attributable to Trump supporters driving a harder negotiation, nevertheless.
- 19 p.c of Trump supporters mentioned they efficiently negotiated their purchaser’s agent price down from a better quantity — virtually precisely as many Harris supporters who mentioned the identical.
However which will change as extra shoppers turn into accustomed to the brand new panorama.
- Extra Republicans mentioned they weren’t conscious that their purchaser’s agent price was negotiable earlier than signing the settlement — 35 p.c of Trump supporters vs. solely 29 p.c amongst Harris supporters.
So if it’s not a negotiation query, then why are extra Trump supporters paying decrease fee charges?
It’s tough to say for certain. There could also be different elements the survey didn’t ask about — reminiscent of market-specific or brokerage-specific issues, and even sampling points within the survey itself — that assist clarify the hole on the customer aspect.
The survey revealed variations between the 2 teams on the vendor aspect as properly.
Harris supporters who’re itemizing a house had been considerably extra more likely to take a strictly conventional strategy to their itemizing — agreeing up entrance to cowl the agent price for any purchaser who purchases their residence.
- 50 p.c of Harris supporters mentioned they had been taking this conventional strategy to their itemizing, in comparison with 41 p.c of Trump supporters who mentioned the identical.
As a substitute, Trump supporters had been a bit extra more likely to say they had been withholding the customer’s agent price up entrance as a negotiating tactic, however that they might be keen to cowl it ultimately.
They had been additionally a bit extra more likely to take a agency stance towards overlaying the price.
And — as seen in response to different settlement-related questions — extra Trump supporters mentioned that they had been unaware of the brand new choices.
The first drivers
Lastly, Intel explored why individuals who have plans to maneuver within the coming months are contemplating taking this step.
Once more, the 2 teams shared a lot in frequent when it got here to their high causes for shifting. However some distinct variations did emerge within the responses.
Trump supporters usually tend to say they’re shifting as a result of…
- …they’re anticipating, or planning to have, a toddler — Doubtless consumers who help Trump had been extra more likely to say they had been trying to purchase a house associated to having a toddler. Greater than 16 p.c of Trump supporters named this as their cause for doubtlessly shopping for, in comparison with fewer than 12 p.c of Harris supporters who mentioned the identical.
Harris supporters usually tend to say they’re shifting as a result of…
- …they’re drawn to the monetary advantages of homeownership — 28 p.c of Harris supporters gave this cause, in comparison with 22 p.c of Trump supporters who mentioned the identical.
- …they’re in search of a greater faculty district — 14 p.c of Harris supporters mentioned they had been motivated by higher faculties, in comparison with 11 p.c of pro-Trump customers.
- …they wish to transfer nearer to household — 30 p.c of Harris supporters chosen this feature, narrowly edging out the 27 p.c of Trump supporters who mentioned the identical.
Taken collectively, it’s clear that Trump supporters and Harris supporters have a lot in frequent, at the very least on the subject of how they strategy the housing market.
However by bringing shoppers up to the mark and incomes belief the place some are skeptical, brokers could possibly bridge gaps the place they exist in a polarized — and continually evolving — actual property setting.
Concerning the Inman-Dig Insights client survey
The Inman-Dig Insights client survey was carried out from Oct. 4-6, 2024, to gauge the opinions and behaviors of Individuals associated to homebuying.
The survey sampled a various group of three,000 American adults, ranging in age from 24 to 65 and employed both full-time or part-time. The members had been chosen to supply a broadly consultant breakdown by age, gender and area.
Statistical rigor was maintained all through the examine, and the outcomes ought to be largely consultant of attitudes held by U.S. adults on this age group with full- or part-time jobs. Each Inman and Dig Insights are majority-owned by Toronto-based Beringer Capital.
